Effect of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations

Erkut, Selim; Yılmaz, Burak; Bağış, Bora; Küçükeşmen, Çiḡdem; Özdemir, Erdem; Acar, Ozlem

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.001

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several authors propose the APA as a cleaning technique of dentin surface after the removal of an interim prosthesis too. Erkut et al [ 7 ] tested some different cleansing treatment effects (microairborne-particle abrasion, alcohol, rubber-rotary instruments, and desiccating agent) on the bond strength of composite resin restoration: they found that the highest bond strength is achieved with the microairborne-particle abrasion technique. They conclude that the results could be attributed to the different surface texture obtained by different techniques.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Starting from this assumption, it can be imagined that dentin surface cleaning may be essential to obtain better bonding between the interfaces [ 7 , 8 ]. Several cleaning methods, both mechanical and chemical, have been proposed [ 7 , 8 ]. Related to chemical cleaning techniques, the most common technique includes the chlorhexidine digluconate, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid use (EDTA) [ 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin

D’Amario

Piccioni

Carlo

et al. 2017

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim of this study was to investigate a specific airborne particle abrasion pretreatment on dentin and its effects on microtensile bond strengths of four commercial total-etch adhesives. Midcoronal occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was used. Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups according to the adhesive system used: OptiBond FL (FL), OptiBond Solo Plus (SO), Prime & Bond (PB), and Riva Bond LC (RB). Specimens from each group were further divided into two subgroups: control specimens were treated with adhesive procedures; abraded specimens were pretreated with airborne particle abrasion using 50 μm Al2O3 before adhesion. After bonding procedures, composite crowns were incrementally built up. Specimens were sectioned perpendicular to adhesive interface to produce multiple beams, which were tested under tension until failure. Data were statistically analysed. Failure mode analysis was performed. Overall comparison showed significant increase in bond strength (p < 0.001) between abraded and no-abraded specimens, independently of brand. Intrabrand comparison showed statistical increase when abraded specimens were tested compared to no-abraded ones, with the exception of PB that did not show such difference. Distribution of failure mode was relatively uniform among all subgroups. Surface treatment by airborne particle abrasion with Al2O3 particles can increase the bond strength of total-etch adhesives.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin

D’Amario

Piccioni

Carlo

et al. 2017

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another factor that negatively affects adhesion is the presence of a smear layer on its surface resultant from the use of rotating tools [10][11][12]. To improve the interaction between resin and dentin and with the aim of removing debris that could impair the final bonding restoration, different dentinal pretreatment techniques have been proposed over time [13][14][15]. Considering only mechanical techniques, it is worth mentioning the use of airabrasion particles (APAs) that allows the improvement of dentin bonding through an ultrafine mechanical retention [16][17][18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microtensile Bond Strength of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives in Different Hydroabrasion Conditionings

Tepedino

Potrubacz

Imperiale

et al. 2021

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present study was to in vitro evaluate the effect of dentin conditioning with hydroabrasion on the microtensile bond strengths of three adhesive systems, compared to the standard etch-and-rinse technique. Sixty extracted human third molars were collected, and their midcoronal occlusal dentin was used for the microtensile bond strength test. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups according to the adhesive system used: ExciTE F DSC, ENA Bond, and Scotchbond Universal. Specimens from each group were further divided into four subgroups: control specimens were treated with standard adhesive procedures; hydroabraded (HA) specimens were subjected to preventive hydroabrasion with three different intensity levels. After bonding procedures, composite crowns were incrementally built up. After thermocycling, specimens were subsequently sectioned into 1 × 1 mm sticks, and microtensile bond strengths were measured. Data were statistically analyzed. Failure mode analysis was performed. There were no significant differences in terms of bond strength between standard adhesion protocols and adhesion with HA preconditionings. On the other hand, the type of adhesive used had a significant effect on the tensile bond strength. Subgroups treated with hydroabrasion at higher intensity showed a slightly increased frequency of cohesive fractures. In conclusion, hydroabrasion can be used for dentin cavity preparation or finishing, since it does not seem to affect the bonding effectiveness.

show abstract

“…Er:YAG laser-irradiation was found as effective as other mechanical methods (dental probe, pumice, and cleaning bur) for the removal of a zinc-oxide provisional agent [11]; a specific type of Erbium laser, on the other hand, successfully contributed to displacement of resin cement residues before re-luting procedures [12]. In a study by Erkut et al, the effect of chemical agents (i.e: alcohol and a desiccating component) for cleaning dentin surfaces was investigated; however, according to the authors, highest bond strength were achieved with the microairborne-particle abrasion treatment [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Removal of temporary cements following an immediate dentin hybridization approach: a comparison of mechanical and chemical methods for substrate cleaning

Augusti

Özcan

et al. 2017

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the microshear bond strength (SBS) of a composite resin cement to a pre-hybridized dentinal substrate exposed to two kinds of temporary materials; the influence of different cleaning techniques was investigated. Dentinal surfaces were conditioned with an etch-and-rinse adhesive system to obtain an immediately-sealed (IDS) layer. Each surface was divided into quadrants and covered (1) with an eugenol-free (NE_Group) or (2) with a resin-based provisional agent (CL_Group). After storage, the temporary cement was removed by using one of the following methods: (1) Hand-scaler [S]; (2) Alumina air-abrasion [SB]; (3) Glycine-powder air-abrasion [Gly]; (4) D-Limonene chemical solvent [Or]. A new IDS layer was then created; polyethylene tubes were placed on dentin surfaces and filled with a dual-cure resin cement. A universal testing machine was used for the SBS tests; conditioned surfaces were analyzed at SEM. Means and SD were calculated; a two-way ANOVA (a: 0.05) was performed to detect significant differences among groups. For NE groups, mean SBS values (MPa) were: 21.6 ± 6.6 [NE_NoT]; 20.7 ± 4.5 [NE_Or]; 20.1 ± 6.6 [NE_SB]; 19.1 ± 5.3 [NE_S]; 17.8 ± 2.2 [NE_Gly]. No significant differences were found among tested treatments within NE (p: 0.5493). For CL groups, mean SBS values (MPa) ranged from 15.8 ± 2.8 (CL_S50) to 19.4 ± 2.9 (CL_Gly). Cleaning of the substrate with glycine air-abrasion statistically improved SBS values with respect to aluminum-oxide (CL_SB: 15.8 ± 2.8) or scaling (CL_S: 16.0 ± 2.4). The application of the IDS technique was effective for preservation of freshly-cut dentin from adverse effects of temporary materials. Glycine air-abrasion is suggested when a temporary resin cement is adopted.

show abstract

Effect of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin

Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin

Microtensile Bond Strength of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives in Different Hydroabrasion Conditionings

Removal of temporary cements following an immediate dentin hybridization approach: a comparison of mechanical and chemical methods for substrate cleaning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About