2022
DOI: 10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Sowing Environment on Growth Parameters, Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer aretinum L.) Varities

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2019-20 in sandy loam    soil of C.S.A. University of Agriculture and Technology, Nawabganj, Kanpur (U.P.).The experiment consisted nine treatments combinations comprised of three sowing date/ sowing temperature viz., sowing on November 10 with temperature 220C, November 20 with temperature 170C and November 30 with temperature 160C and three variety viz, KWR-108, KPG-59 and KGD-1168. Results revealed that sowing temperature 220C which occurred on November… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum grain yield (52.00 q ha -1 ), straw yield (65.80 q ha -1 ) and biological yield (117.80 q ha -1 ) were recorded under the treatment T6 [125 % RDF + Azotobacter] followed by treatment T7 [100 % RDF + Azotobacter] with the value 46.33, 55.63 and 101.96 q ha -1 and minimum grain (25.33 q ha -1 ), straw yield (29.80 q ha -1 ) and biological yield (55.13 q ha -1 ) of wheat were recorded in control. These findings are further supported by the findings of Sirohiya et al, [17] and Tiwari et al, [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Productivity Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Maximum grain yield (52.00 q ha -1 ), straw yield (65.80 q ha -1 ) and biological yield (117.80 q ha -1 ) were recorded under the treatment T6 [125 % RDF + Azotobacter] followed by treatment T7 [100 % RDF + Azotobacter] with the value 46.33, 55.63 and 101.96 q ha -1 and minimum grain (25.33 q ha -1 ), straw yield (29.80 q ha -1 ) and biological yield (55.13 q ha -1 ) of wheat were recorded in control. These findings are further supported by the findings of Sirohiya et al, [17] and Tiwari et al, [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Productivity Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Yield attributes of Chickpea [7]. "Nipping of chickpea especially during last week of December to the end of January not only instrumental in providing extra feeding material for cattle but also have significant effect on number of productive branches per plant, number of pods per plant, 100 seeds weight and yield (kg ha-1) of this crop" (Khan et al, [8]. These finding in accordance with Aziz, M. A.…”
Section: Effect Of Spacing and Nipping Onmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…"After measuring the weight of the air-dried bundles with a spring balance, the harvested crop was tied in labelled bundles and threshed using a tractor-drawn thresher. Plot-by-plot records of the grain and straw yields were made and translated to q/ha" [14]. ) "The total weight of clean and dried grains from each plot was weighed with the help of electronic balance in kg/ha and converted into q/ha" [14].…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plot-by-plot records of the grain and straw yields were made and translated to q/ha" [14]. ) "The total weight of clean and dried grains from each plot was weighed with the help of electronic balance in kg/ha and converted into q/ha" [14].…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation