2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different high-palladium metal-ceramic alloys on the color of opaque and dentin porcelain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The drawback of such restorations is increased light reflectivity due to opaque porcelain layer. 27,28 All-ceramic crowns permit greater light transmission through the crown and can mimic natural tooth appearance in terms of color, surface texture, and translucency. [29][30][31] Nevertheless, variations in translucency in core material in a restoration may influence the final optical outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drawback of such restorations is increased light reflectivity due to opaque porcelain layer. 27,28 All-ceramic crowns permit greater light transmission through the crown and can mimic natural tooth appearance in terms of color, surface texture, and translucency. [29][30][31] Nevertheless, variations in translucency in core material in a restoration may influence the final optical outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 A color difference of 2 ∆E units has been described as an acceptable clinical shade match in dentistry, whereas color differences above 3.5 ∆E units are considered unacceptable and are visually detectable. 28 The ultimate goal in achieving an accurate color match is to achieve ΔE values lowest possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under intraoral conditions the limit to clinical acceptability will be in the range of $2.8-3.7 DE units. [28][29][30] Considering that a DE value of more than 3.7 is regarded as a clinically detectable color difference, mean DE grade in the present study were easy to identify under intraoral conditions, which were more than 8.0 DE units (Table IV). Thus, it was definite and reliable to determine RB staining results according to the present shade guide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Taking into account the criteria of ∆E* > 3.6 as the acceptable level of color difference 15,16 above mentioned, Table 6 evidences that many of the experimental samples fit the requirements needed for approval as potential coating material in dental prosthesis application.…”
Section: Potential Application Of the Pigmentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The CIELab method can also be used for evaluation of the instrumental tolerance (∆E*) or the range of clinically acceptable color difference between the prosthesis and the natural tooth color of a patient 15 . This analysis is accomplished by applying Equation 1, presented below:…”
Section: Potential Application Of the Pigmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%