2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(10)60034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
147
2
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
11
147
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism by which plaque adheres to and forms on the surface of teeth and restoration materials has been extensively studied (3)(4)(5). Saliva-derived pellicles immediately form on the surfaces of thoroughly cleaned teeth and attract bacteria through chemical or electrostatic interactions or by antigens on the surfaces of bacterial cells (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism by which plaque adheres to and forms on the surface of teeth and restoration materials has been extensively studied (3)(4)(5). Saliva-derived pellicles immediately form on the surfaces of thoroughly cleaned teeth and attract bacteria through chemical or electrostatic interactions or by antigens on the surfaces of bacterial cells (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are important because a change in the roughness of modified resin could increase the biofilm accumulation. In accordance with this, several studies have shown that a rougher surface favors the biofilm growth on restorative materials (18)(19)(20). In contrast, an experimental composite adhesive containing silver nanoparticles that also presented bactericidal property showed rougher surface than conventional adhesive (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The surface characteristics of the solid substratum and the adhering bacteria can affect the adherence process 20 . Aykent et al 21 observed a positive correlation between surface roughness and S. mutans adhesion. Several studies shown the oral bacterial adherence on rough surfaces of dental implant biomaterials 22,23 .…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 97%