2020
DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.280893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different coloring techniques and surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the values of TP ranged from 18.82 and 14.20 for zirconia at TP (T1) and for Mark II at T3, respectively; these values coincided with those publications recorded for the materials used for inlays and veneer ceramic materials [17][18][19][22][23]. The ΔE 00 values at different time intervals were within the clinically acceptable range reported by previous studies [17][18]22,24]. The mean color changes were decreased at T3 (between 15 and 30 days) in parallel with previously reported values mentioned by (Koseoglu et [11,13,[17][18]22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the values of TP ranged from 18.82 and 14.20 for zirconia at TP (T1) and for Mark II at T3, respectively; these values coincided with those publications recorded for the materials used for inlays and veneer ceramic materials [17][18][19][22][23]. The ΔE 00 values at different time intervals were within the clinically acceptable range reported by previous studies [17][18]22,24]. The mean color changes were decreased at T3 (between 15 and 30 days) in parallel with previously reported values mentioned by (Koseoglu et [11,13,[17][18]22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…where subscript B refers to the color coordinates against the B background and subscript W refers to those against the W background [17][18][19]. ΔE 00 is the color difference calculated on the basis of the color coordinate differences between two objects or between a restoration and a tooth/target.…”
Section: Color Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface roughness is one of the most important criteria that affects the biofilm accumulation on dental materials [ 21 , 32 ]. This study evaluated both R a and R z values because in case of equality of the R a values, less R z values imply smoother surface [ 33 ]. Although all the surface roughness values in this study were higher than the threshold (0.2 μm) that could eliminate the role of surface roughness in plaque adherence [ 34 , 35 ], they were below the limit for clinical undetectability of roughness (10 μm) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blocks of VITA MII ceramic have fine constructed particles, and a different machining system to improve mechanical properties and strength [ 1 ]. These blocks were monochromatic or available in multi-shade layers that permit a shade gradient as well as improved translucency [ 1 , 5 , 6 ]. Other brands of polymer-infiltrated ceramics and resin nano-ceramics, based on their contents, have improved material properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%