2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dietary mannan‐oligosaccharides onin vivoperformance, nutrient digestibility and caecal content characteristics of growing rabbits

Abstract: To evaluate the effect of mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS) on in vivo performance, nutrient digestibility, fermentation characteristics and caecal microbial populations of rabbits, 144 thirty-five days old hybrid Hyla were equally divided into three groups, one of which was fed the same diet without additives (control group), one with antibiotics (colistin sulphate, 144 mg/kg; tylosin, 100 mg/kg; oxytetracyclin, 1000 mg/kg) and one with MOS (1 g/kg of diet). Mortality rate, live weight, feed intake and feed conve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The final live body weights of rabbit (1718 to 1805 g) are close to 1746 g found at the same age in local population of rabbit in Tunisia [14]. The body weights of rabbits are also in the range of 1638.9 to 1862.5 g [15]. No medical prophylactic cure was provided to rabbits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The final live body weights of rabbit (1718 to 1805 g) are close to 1746 g found at the same age in local population of rabbit in Tunisia [14]. The body weights of rabbits are also in the range of 1638.9 to 1862.5 g [15]. No medical prophylactic cure was provided to rabbits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(), that when the sanitary status of the farm is satisfactory, the additives have a little or no effects in improving rabbit performance. In this regard, when hygienic condition of the farm is good, also the sanitary status of the digestive system is good, because of the few number of intestinal pathogens in build environment and, as a consequence, the additives are not able to give further improvement to increase feed digestibility (Bovera et al., ) considering that, when digestibility of feed increases under a dietary treatment including additives, it is mainly due to increasing digestibility of structural carbohydrates as a direct consequence of a higher fermentative activity of caecal microflora in respect of structural carbohydrates and proteins (Bovera et al., ,b). In fact, almost all the supplements (with the exception of MOS administered alone) are able to improve in respect of the control group the height/width ratio but this is not sufficient to improve growth performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…powder, extract or oil, the composition of the basal diet, and the environmental, hygienic conditions and animal age. In general, growth promoters had less favourable effects when animals were fed highly digestible diets or were raised in optimal environmental conditions (Bovera et al 2012;Pourmahmoud et al 2013;Ma sek et al 2014;Attia et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%