1984
DOI: 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90057-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dietary 2-mercaptoethanol on the life span, immune system, tumor incidence and lipid peroxidation damage in spleen lymphocytes of aging BC3F1 mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34] Based on the multitude of beneficial effects of 2-Me for cell functions in vitro plus mercaptan changes that occur with age and protein deprivation 35,36 (which led to the free radical theory of aging 25 ) raised the question: What consequences, besides toxicity, 37 might 2-Me impart if administered as a dietary supplement? This was especially intriguing considering its effect on changes associated with aging; (a) modestly increased life span of long-lived mice, 23 (b) delayed decline of immune functions with age, 23,38 (c) except for old C57BL, enhanced the immune response of old mice by a single injection, 39 (d) reversed the loss of antibody responsiveness in old mice back to that of young mice by only 3 or 4 weekly injections, 39 (e) delayed the spontaneous appearance of tumors release, 40 and (g) prevented malondialdehyde formation. 40 This latter chemical is implicated in irreversible cross-linking of proteins and DNA, 41 which is formed along with lipofuscins 23,42,43 during autooxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34] Based on the multitude of beneficial effects of 2-Me for cell functions in vitro plus mercaptan changes that occur with age and protein deprivation 35,36 (which led to the free radical theory of aging 25 ) raised the question: What consequences, besides toxicity, 37 might 2-Me impart if administered as a dietary supplement? This was especially intriguing considering its effect on changes associated with aging; (a) modestly increased life span of long-lived mice, 23 (b) delayed decline of immune functions with age, 23,38 (c) except for old C57BL, enhanced the immune response of old mice by a single injection, 39 (d) reversed the loss of antibody responsiveness in old mice back to that of young mice by only 3 or 4 weekly injections, 39 (e) delayed the spontaneous appearance of tumors release, 40 and (g) prevented malondialdehyde formation. 40 This latter chemical is implicated in irreversible cross-linking of proteins and DNA, 41 which is formed along with lipofuscins 23,42,43 during autooxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, addition of 2-Me to culture media was found beneficial for growth/ function of other cell types, including those of other species. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Although a number of mechanisms have been proposed for 2-Me's action in tissue culture, 22,23 it, as well as other sulfhydryl compounds, are generally categorized (a) as free radical reaction inhibitors/scavengers, 24 and/or (b) to maintain (i) appropriate protein sulfhydryl-disulfide moieties for function, (ii) nature's endogenous thiol-disulfide-factors, such as glutathione and thioredoxin, at functional concentrations and proper cellular redox balance, [25][26][27][28] and (iii) sulfhydryls present on cell surface membranes in appropriate thiol-disulfide states. [29][30][31][32][33][34] Based on the multitude of beneficial effects of 2-Me for cell functions in vitro plus mercaptan changes that occur with age and protein deprivation 35,36 (which led to the free radical theory of aging 25 ) raised the question: What consequences, besides toxicity, 37 might 2-Me impart if administered as a dietary supplement?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these has been investigated in model systems with various degrees of success, but few have yet emerged from clinical trials as strong candidates. The strongest evidence for a biological role for ROS comes from treatment of mice with antioxidants that have achieved life extension as well as reduced neurodegeneration (Heidrick et al, 1984;Holloszy, 1998;Meydani et al, 1998). Treatment of Atm mice with antioxidants has shown promising success in reducing Purkinje cell damage and improving behavioral endpoints Gueven et al, 2006).…”
Section: What Constitutes Feasible Therapeutic Targets?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementation with 2-Me was well-tolerated as it did not alter consumption of food or water and did not result in weight loss/gain compared with age-matched controls-these data are not included since it did not differ from that reported previously for many other strains. [18][19][20][21]31,40 Treatment with 2-Me was started at weaning (35-40 d of age) and continued for an animal's entire life. Average daily consumption of 2-Me fluctuated over the lifetime from 60-80 ugm/gm body wt.…”
Section: Bxsb-yaamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on xenobiotic sulfur compounds with simple structures has generally been focused on in vitro benefits for a multitude of cell-types and processes (> 1,000 articles in PubMed). Subsequently, as might be expected, xenobiotics (primarily 2-Me and cysteamine) when either injected into or fed to animals were found to modify a multitude of disease processes (REC in preparation), including spontaneous tumor development [18][19][20] and virally-, 21,22 carcinogenic- [23][24][25][26][27][28] and radiation-induced cancers. [29][30][31] The present report describes alteration of spontaneous and virally-induced tumor development by the extensively investigated immune enhancing, xenobiotic organosulfur, 2-Me and compares its anticancer efficacy to that of other organosulfurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%