“…Several critical factors affect the deformation of the dispersed TLCP phase under the shear flow such as the applied shear stress, viscosity ratio, and the interfacial tension. − Numerous studies have shown that these rheological factors influence the deformation of the dispersed phase, particularly the ratio of the viscosities of the dispersed phase and the matrix polymer as well as the elasticity effect. ,− Kirchberger and Münstedt have recently surveyed previous studies of droplet deformation . Over the past 2 decades, we have continuously sought for a feasible method for easily deforming a TLCP phase dispersed in a matrix with a viscosity lower than that of the TLCP phase. − In principle, such a deformation is possible if the interfacial tension is sufficiently low that the capillary number (i.e., a ratio of the shear stress to the interfacial tension) becomes larger than the critical capillary number (see the discussion of Figure ). − We have studied the behaviors of blends of nylons with some immiscible TLCPs and have found that when an extensional flow is applied during the processing, the TLCPs can be elongated into a fibrous shape oriented in the flow direction. − , In the absence of this extensional component, however, only spherical domains were observed. − , Although strong drawing after the die exit can somewhat deform the dispersed droplets, this approach is not readily applicable to nylon blends because of their drawing instability. − These difficulties also arise with other polymers synthesized via polycondensation, such as polyamides or polyesters, which exhibit peculiar rheological properties that differ dramatically from those of other polymers synthesized via free-radical polymerizations, i.e., they have a broad Newtonian viscosity plateau over a wide range of shear rates as well as a rather low melt viscosity .…”