1974
DOI: 10.1038/ki.1974.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dialysate volume on peritoneal dialysis kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss was greater in the group with the higher predialysis plasma levels and this comparison proved to be statistically very significant (p< 0.001). Tak ing for granted that the other factors influencing the peri toneal dialysis remain stable, this fact is due to the gradient [Goldsmith et al 1974;Gross et al 1967;Tsapas et al 1975].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss was greater in the group with the higher predialysis plasma levels and this comparison proved to be statistically very significant (p< 0.001). Tak ing for granted that the other factors influencing the peri toneal dialysis remain stable, this fact is due to the gradient [Goldsmith et al 1974;Gross et al 1967;Tsapas et al 1975].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally there are two main reasons thought to cause this inverse relationship between volume and D / P urea and creatinine. The first is that larger volumes of dialysate require somewhat longer time to reach equivalent D / P solute, most notable during the first 2 hours (13–15). Potential remedies to this problem in the future might be a cycler or catheter that allows better mixing of the dialysate and increases contact time with the peritoneal membrane.…”
Section: Percentage Increase In Clearances With Increase In Exchange mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be remembered that it is not convenient to overfill the peritoneal cavity: in fact, the time required to achieve equilibrium between the peritoneal solution and serum increases in proportion to the volume of liquid used, this is probably due to changes in the volume/surface ratio [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%