2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of desiccation on shut-in benefits in removing water blockage in tight water-wet cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the gas relative permeability showed a decline of 25.7% according to the rock relative permeability data. This is mainly because water invaded the low-pressure layer along with the gas back-flow and will have led to an increase in water saturation and to water block 28–30 . The closer they were to the outlet, the greater the influence of the back-flow, the greater the increase in water saturation, and the greater the decline in permeability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the gas relative permeability showed a decline of 25.7% according to the rock relative permeability data. This is mainly because water invaded the low-pressure layer along with the gas back-flow and will have led to an increase in water saturation and to water block 28–30 . The closer they were to the outlet, the greater the influence of the back-flow, the greater the increase in water saturation, and the greater the decline in permeability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the measures for handling water blocking mainly include shut-in, chemical additive application, and hydraulic fracturing. Wijaya and Sheng indicated that shut-in is effective because it dissipates the water blockage from the matrix-fracture interface, causing deeper matrix penetration through capillary imbibition [7]. However, this method requires a lengthy implementation time and is too passive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3−8 However, the traditional coal seam fracturing methods have some limitations that not only can produce a water lock and water sensitivity during construction, but some methods also cause pollution and wastewater resources. 9,10 As a water-free technique for increasing coal seam permeability, liquid nitrogen fracturing has been extensively studied by many researchers. 11−16 Research on coal gas adsorption includes that by Meng et al, 17 who established the XGBoost model for evaluating gas adsorption capacity and optimizing shale gas production curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coalbed methane, dominantly methane, is an important energy resource, and many countries have realized the use of coalbed methane. Gas extraction is not only the most direct way to solve the coal mine gas problem but also the best way to collect and utilize the gas. , Coal seams have low permeability, and many fracturing methods have been proposed, and some of them used, to increase the seam’s permeability and allow efficient gas extraction. However, the traditional coal seam fracturing methods have some limitations that not only can produce a water lock and water sensitivity during construction, but some methods also cause pollution and wastewater resources. , As a water-free technique for increasing coal seam permeability, liquid nitrogen fracturing has been extensively studied by many researchers. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%