1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-9062(99)00016-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cyclic loading and strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of sandstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to formula (11), the damage variable is normalized while the damage variable D based on the cumulative energy of acoustic emission is obtained. e curve of the deviatoric stress and damage variable over time in the process of synchronous unloading under triaxial conditions is given.…”
Section: Simultaneous Unloading Damage Change Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to formula (11), the damage variable is normalized while the damage variable D based on the cumulative energy of acoustic emission is obtained. e curve of the deviatoric stress and damage variable over time in the process of synchronous unloading under triaxial conditions is given.…”
Section: Simultaneous Unloading Damage Change Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, they also analyzed the mechanical characteristics of stress paths in the unloading direction with axial loading. Ray et al [11] analyzed the strain and mechanical characteristics of sandstone under cyclic loading. Bagde and Petros [12] made a study about the fatigue characteristics and energy transformation of rock under cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray et al (1999) report fatigue cycling of a sandstone at three strain rates. Singh et al (1989) performed uniaxial compression tests on sandstone and on marble at strain rates from 10 -6 to 10 3 /s, showing a systematic strength increase with strain rate.…”
Section: Triaxial Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies, however, mostly support that the strength of rock decreases as a result of cyclic loading due to progressive damage of rock (Bieniawski 1967, Eberhardt et al 1999, Koseki et al 2003, Chen et al 2006, Xiao et al 2010). According to Ray et al (1998), the percentage decrease in uniaxial compressive strength increases with the number of cycles applied. Along with this, Singh (1989) discusses, however, that in some cases the applied stress level in cyclic loading does not cause rock failure during a very large number of cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%