1960
DOI: 10.1093/jee/53.2.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Culm Solidness on the Survival of the Wheat Stem Sawfly1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a recent Montana greenhouse study reported that P‐deficient wheat plants were most susceptible to sawfly damage (Delaney et al, 2010). In a Saskatchewan study, no effects of N or P could be detected due to the strong influence of other environmental factors (DePauw and Read, 1982), which is similar to a North Dakota study that reported significantly more sawfly cutting in fertilized plots in only one of eight experiments (O'Keeffe et al, 1960). The disagreement among these studies underscores the stochastic nature of site‐specific, soil‐plant fertility dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, a recent Montana greenhouse study reported that P‐deficient wheat plants were most susceptible to sawfly damage (Delaney et al, 2010). In a Saskatchewan study, no effects of N or P could be detected due to the strong influence of other environmental factors (DePauw and Read, 1982), which is similar to a North Dakota study that reported significantly more sawfly cutting in fertilized plots in only one of eight experiments (O'Keeffe et al, 1960). The disagreement among these studies underscores the stochastic nature of site‐specific, soil‐plant fertility dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The N results of our study agree with Luginbill and McNeal (1954) as the authors reported no effect when N was applied alone at rates of 60 and 120 kg N ha −1 . A study comparing unfertilized spring wheat plots to those with basal rates of approximately 40 kg N ha −1 also report little effect from fertilization (O'Keeffe et al, 1960), and DePauw and Read (1982) reported that environmental factors were more important for pith expression than fertility management practices. Environmental factors that would affect pith expression are those related to precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stems were cross sectionally cut in the center of five internodes. The level of pith in each internode was rated on a previously established scale ranging from 1 to 5; 1 was considered hollow and 5 was solid (O'Keefe et al, 1960; Wallace et al, 1973). Ratings for each of the five internodes were summed providing a total stem solidness score ranging from 5 (hollow) to 25 (solid) for each stem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pith developing in a solid stem is a key source of mortality in the egg (Holmes and Peterson 1961) and larval stages, causing the greatest amount of irreplaceable mortality in solid stem wheat (Buteler et al 2015). The boring activity of larvae that do survive can be restricted, creating negative effects on the fitness and survivorship of the insect (O'Keeffe et al 1960;Cárcamo et al 2005). Thus, the efficacy of the plant's resistance is based on its ability to develop pith in the culm of the stem, which is influenced greatly by interactions between the genotype and local environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%