2019
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab1f4a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cu, Ag on the microstructure and IMC evolution of Sn5Sb–CuAgNi/Cu solder joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding certain Cu and Ag elements can reduce the melting point of solders and expand the melting range (El-Daly et al, 2005, 2011, while improving the wettability. Reports from another investigation (Han et al, 2019) have revealed a significant enhancement for trace Cu and Ag elements on wettability results and the IMC evolution of the Sn-5Sb-based solder systems. It was also found that the IMC was (Cu, Ni) 6 Sn 5 .…”
Section: Effects Of Alloying Elements On the Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding certain Cu and Ag elements can reduce the melting point of solders and expand the melting range (El-Daly et al, 2005, 2011, while improving the wettability. Reports from another investigation (Han et al, 2019) have revealed a significant enhancement for trace Cu and Ag elements on wettability results and the IMC evolution of the Sn-5Sb-based solder systems. It was also found that the IMC was (Cu, Ni) 6 Sn 5 .…”
Section: Effects Of Alloying Elements On the Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The alloys were smelted repeatedly three times, and then cooled and sealed to prevent reoxidation. In a previous investigation (Han et al, 2019), the melting points (liquidus temperatures) of the Sn-5Sb-based solder alloys were determined by differential scanning calorimetry and are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Smelting Of Solder Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the figure, the Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu had a better creep resistance than Cu/Sn-5Sb/Cu. A previous study proved that the Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu joint had better plasticity than Cu/Sn5Sb/Cu (Han et al, 2019a(Han et al, , 2019b(Han et al, , 2019c. Figure 1(c) is the shear distance-force of the joints, the plastic distance of Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu was larger than that of Sn5Sb/Cu, and the force of Cu/Sn5Sb/Cu increased more sharply than Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu (Han et al, 2019a(Han et al, , 2019b(Han et al, , 2019c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A previous study proved that the Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu joint had better plasticity than Cu/Sn5Sb/Cu (Han et al, 2019a(Han et al, , 2019b(Han et al, , 2019c. Figure 1(c) is the shear distance-force of the joints, the plastic distance of Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu was larger than that of Sn5Sb/Cu, and the force of Cu/Sn5Sb/Cu increased more sharply than Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu (Han et al, 2019a(Han et al, , 2019b(Han et al, , 2019c. In conclusion, the mechanical properties of Cu/Sn5Sb-0.5Cu-0.1Ni-0.5Ag/Cu, including the hardness, creep performance and plasticity, were much better than those of Cu/Sn-5Sb/Cu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation