2020
DOI: 10.3390/plants10010034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cryopreservation on Olive (Olea europaea L.) Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis

Abstract: Olive somatic embryos have been successfully cryopreserved using the droplet-vitrification method on aluminum foil strips. Although acceptable recovery rates have been obtained after rewarming, the influence of this cryopreservation protocol on the somatic embryogenesis process is unknown. To evaluate the effect of cryopreservation on olive somatic embryogenesis, the behavior of cultures established from cryopreserved somatic embryos was compared with that of control, non-cryopreserved cultures in the differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the vigor of plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis depending on the genotypic background have been previously reported in olive [19]. The better features observed in plantlets of the line P5 could be explained by differences in the previous maturation phase, which occurred with different efficiencies depending on the embryogenic line [19,20] and largely determines the final output of the somatic embryogenesis process and the quality of the regenerated plants [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Differences in the vigor of plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis depending on the genotypic background have been previously reported in olive [19]. The better features observed in plantlets of the line P5 could be explained by differences in the previous maturation phase, which occurred with different efficiencies depending on the embryogenic line [19,20] and largely determines the final output of the somatic embryogenesis process and the quality of the regenerated plants [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In general, regenerated plants display no morphological variation after cryopreservation ( Harding, 2004 ). For example, cryopreservation did not modify the regeneration potential or the quality of the regenerated plants in olive ( Bradaï and Sánchez-Romero, 2021 ), in grapevine ( Wang et al., 2002 ; Vasanth and Vivier, 2011 ), in paradise tree ( Melia azedarach L.) ( Scocchi et al., 2007 ), and in Citrus sp. ( Pérez et al., 1998 ).…”
Section: Genetic Stability Analysis In Cryopreserved Embryogenic Mate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradaï and Sánchez-Romero [41] evaluated the effect of cryopreservation on the different phases of the somatic embryogenesis process. For this purpose, the behavior of cultures established from cryopreserved somatic embryos was compared with that of control, non-cryopreserved cultures during the proliferation, maturation, and germination steps.…”
Section: Somatic Embryogenesis In Olivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though different somatic embryogenesis protocols are available in olive [20], their efficiency varies depending on the genotype [20,22,41]. This influence of the genetic constitution has been observed in the different phases of this multi-step technique, from the initiation of embryogenic cultures [21,43] to the germination of somatic embryos [40].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%