2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cross-linking on the performance of polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs) for the extraction, transport and separation of Zn(II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, although the permeability coefficient and initial flux of cross‐linked PVDF‐HFP based membrane were also larger compared with that of the corresponding non‐cross‐linked membrane, the difference between these two membranes was not as significant as that of CTA based PIMs. A similar results were found by Hoque et al 25 who used PIM with bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA) as the carrier and 2‐NPOE as the plasticizer to extract Zn(II). Results found that the cross‐linked membrane containing CTA as base polymer provided superior Zn(II) extraction efficiency than its non‐cross‐linked membrane, which were about 28 and 22 mg g −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, although the permeability coefficient and initial flux of cross‐linked PVDF‐HFP based membrane were also larger compared with that of the corresponding non‐cross‐linked membrane, the difference between these two membranes was not as significant as that of CTA based PIMs. A similar results were found by Hoque et al 25 who used PIM with bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA) as the carrier and 2‐NPOE as the plasticizer to extract Zn(II). Results found that the cross‐linked membrane containing CTA as base polymer provided superior Zn(II) extraction efficiency than its non‐cross‐linked membrane, which were about 28 and 22 mg g −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As displayed, all the PIMs showed hydrophilic property with the contact angle well below 90°.The contact angle values for cross‐linked CTA and PVDF‐HFP based membranes were 26.7° and 18.5°, respectively, which were much lower than their non‐cross‐linked counterparts (32.7° and 42.3°, respectively). This observation was related to the introduction of hydrophilic PEG groups in PEG‐DMA polymer after crosslinking 25 . Studies have illustrated that ion exchange membranes with more hydrophilic nature are more ion conductive 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of cross‐linking polymer inclusion membranes (PIM) was investigated by Hoque, Almeida, Cattrall, Gopakumar, and Kolev (2019) using three different base‐polymers as follows: poly (Vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly (vinylidene fluoride‐co‐hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF‐HFP), and cellulose triacetate (CTA). CTA‐based PIMs demonstrated a better extraction rate when compared to PVDF‐HFP based PIMs or non‐cross‐linked PIMS containing PVDF‐HFP base polymer.…”
Section: Industrial Wastewater Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors refer to these processes as the complexation induced phase separation (CIPS) and reaction induced phase separation (RIPS) using crosslinkers dissolved in a solvent bath. Unlike some crosslinking processes [ 32 , 33 ] the CIPS and RIPS occur instantaneously through chemical association. By using the same solvent of the dope solution, the polymer-metal complex rapidly precipitates in CIPS/RIPS through crosslinking at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%