2020
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane processes

Abstract: This literature review provides a review for publications in 2018 and 2019 and includes information membrane processes findings for municipal and industrial applications. This review is a subsection of the annual Water Environment Federation literature review for Treatment Systems section. The following topics are covered in this literature review: industrial wastewater and membrane. Bioreactor (MBR) configuration, membrane fouling, design, reuse, nutrient removal, operation, anaerobic membrane systems, microc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 482 publications
(541 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A complete list of advantages, disadvantages, and gaps to overcome in the industry for each biological alternative is presented in Table 3. For technical descriptions, the cited texts are suggested (Arabi et al, 2020;Hamedi et In the same way as adsorption technologies, biological processes such as Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS), Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), and Biological Nutrient Recovery, have securely established themselves in terms of commercial use and technological maturity, indicating their wide acceptability in the industry (Figure 8). This, in comparison to mentioned processes namely membrane separation, AO processes, and coagulation that are considered technologically mature to a lesser extent and require further development for increasing their use in the industry, but expected an upward rise in the use because of the intensi cation of refractory pollutants (Ranade & Bhandari, 2014b).…”
Section: Biological Treatment Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete list of advantages, disadvantages, and gaps to overcome in the industry for each biological alternative is presented in Table 3. For technical descriptions, the cited texts are suggested (Arabi et al, 2020;Hamedi et In the same way as adsorption technologies, biological processes such as Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS), Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), and Biological Nutrient Recovery, have securely established themselves in terms of commercial use and technological maturity, indicating their wide acceptability in the industry (Figure 8). This, in comparison to mentioned processes namely membrane separation, AO processes, and coagulation that are considered technologically mature to a lesser extent and require further development for increasing their use in the industry, but expected an upward rise in the use because of the intensi cation of refractory pollutants (Ranade & Bhandari, 2014b).…”
Section: Biological Treatment Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the peroxyoxalate system can be applied in different fields of pharmacology and diagnosis. Since malignant cells produce increased amounts of hydrogen peroxide, formulations based on oxalates can be used to show the foci of tumor growth and other inflammatory processes (10–13). A wide variety of organic compounds can be determined through the peroxyoxalate system, including cholesterol, glucose, lactose, bilirubin, oxalate, formaldehyde, formic acid, L‐amino acid, polyamines and acetylcholine (14–17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, membrane processes are currently being widely studied for industrial water treatment in many contexts, such as mining, 17 agriculture, food and beverage industries, textile industry, leachate treatment plants, power plants, refineries, and various types of plants in the oil and gas sectors. 1,18,19 In this context, the literature about membrane processes for oily wastewater treatment is contradictory. On the one hand, several papers have demonstrated that HCs cause membrane fouling [20][21][22][23][24] and, thus, severely reduce performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported results underline a good rejection of pollutants, but problems of fouling and deterioration of the membranes were encountered due to the interaction with organic components. In further works, 18,26 membrane applications for refinery wastewater treatment are reviewed, considering microfiltration, ultrafiltration (UF), and RO, and highlighting the huge potential of membrane technologies for water treatment in the petroleum industry. 26 Twelve refineries worldwide are listed, all of which implement water reuse based on membrane processes, mainly RO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%