1946
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1946.00021962003800010009x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Crop Residues on Soil Temperature1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have reported that the soil thermal regime under crop residue mulch is different from that of bare soil, with soil temperatures often being lower under mulched surfaces than in Daily maximum and minimum soil temperatures at the 2.5-cm depth below bare (BS), horizontal mulch (HM) and vertical mulch (VM) surfaces (from Bristow, 1988) bare (or plowed) soils (Englehorn, 1946;McCalla and Duley, 1946;Verma and Kohnke, 1951;Jacks et al, 1955;Lemon, 1956;Borst and Mederski, 1957;McCalla and Army, 1961;Unger, 1978;Gupta et al, 1983;Bristow, 1988;Unger, 1988 Bristow (1988) studied bare soil (BS), vertical mulch (VM), and horizontal mulch (HM) treatments, and found that soil water dominated the energy exchange process at the soil surface, and that it was only when the soils began to dry that significant differences in soil temperatures became evident. After several dry days, the HM treatment soil was 10 °C cooler than the bare soil surface; the VM soil was 7 °C cooler (Fig.…”
Section: Crop Residue Effects On Soil Temperature and Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have reported that the soil thermal regime under crop residue mulch is different from that of bare soil, with soil temperatures often being lower under mulched surfaces than in Daily maximum and minimum soil temperatures at the 2.5-cm depth below bare (BS), horizontal mulch (HM) and vertical mulch (VM) surfaces (from Bristow, 1988) bare (or plowed) soils (Englehorn, 1946;McCalla and Duley, 1946;Verma and Kohnke, 1951;Jacks et al, 1955;Lemon, 1956;Borst and Mederski, 1957;McCalla and Army, 1961;Unger, 1978;Gupta et al, 1983;Bristow, 1988;Unger, 1988 Bristow (1988) studied bare soil (BS), vertical mulch (VM), and horizontal mulch (HM) treatments, and found that soil water dominated the energy exchange process at the soil surface, and that it was only when the soils began to dry that significant differences in soil temperatures became evident. After several dry days, the HM treatment soil was 10 °C cooler than the bare soil surface; the VM soil was 7 °C cooler (Fig.…”
Section: Crop Residue Effects On Soil Temperature and Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of SA on the dynamics of soil water, runoff, infiltration, soil temperature, nutrients and soil water use and productivity are contradictory because of soil characteristics, climate and crop and soil management practices which vary enormously [9,[12][13][14]. Generally, residue incorporation reduces surface runoff, increases SM, crop transpiration and WUE (crop water use efficiency), and decreases ST; the extent to which this happens is mainly determined by the growth stage and the amount of residue returned to the soil [9,[16][17][18][19]. Furthermore, intensified straw application significantly reduces evapotranspiration at the grain-filling to the maturity stages, and significantly increases surface SM at the grain-filling stage and considerably improves rainfall-use efficiency (RUE) during the whole growth period [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant growth is influenced by soil temperature and molsture, both of which are influenced by mulching. Several workers ( 6,11) found lower soil temperatures under straw mulch than for nonmulched areas, while Loupo found that mulches were most effective on sunny days. 3 In addition to conserving soil moisture, mulches increased water infiltration from 0.24 inch per hour on 6 bare cultivated soils to 0.74 inch on mulched soils (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%