2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of crises on charisma signaling: A regression discontinuity design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study has at least three practical implications. Firstly, our study stresses the power of CLTs (Bastardoz et al, 2022;Ernst et al, 2021;Fest et al, 2021;Meslec et al, 2020). We strongly recommend to train leaders in CLTs so that they appear more charismatic, prototypical, and effective.…”
Section: Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our study has at least three practical implications. Firstly, our study stresses the power of CLTs (Bastardoz et al, 2022;Ernst et al, 2021;Fest et al, 2021;Meslec et al, 2020). We strongly recommend to train leaders in CLTs so that they appear more charismatic, prototypical, and effective.…”
Section: Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A before-and-after textual analysis of the rhetoric used by Ukrainian leadership showed that with “the start of conflict with Russia in March 2014, there was a 6% increase in nationalist rhetoric couched in political issues” (Kasianenko, 2021, p. 120). Content analysis of speeches by French President François Holland before and after terrorist attacks in Paris and Nice during 2015–16 also found that President Holland increased his use of charismatic rhetoric (Bastardoz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In analyses of financial and terrorism crises, Olsson and co-authors concluded that Norwegian leaders used rhetorical frames that included “cultural congruence” with the country’s values (Olsson et al, 2015) and “morality” (Nord & Olsson, 2013). Analyses of terrorist attacks in the United States and France led Bastardoz et al (2022, p. 16) to conclude that crisis leaders “have the latitude to focus on a common enemy … by communicating values that differentiate the good and the bad” and, in doing so, “champion the collective and show that they share their followers’ feelings.” In particular, an individual-level analysis of MFT and foreign policy attitudes showed that “moral frames may be one technique decision makers can employ to mobilize support for their desired foreign policy options” (Kertzer et al, 2014, p. 838). Consistent with these conclusions, we propose five hypotheses that are gleaned from our discussion of the geo-political context of the three case studies and informed by the scholarship on crisis leadership and the logic of MFT.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liden and Antonakis (2009) argue that the situations often shape the leadership traits and define the approach of the leaders to tackle such crises. Thus, to explain the role of leaders during the crises such as pandemics resulting from the COVID-19 mandate the crisis leadership (Wu et al 2021;Bastardoz et al 2022). The growing body of rich literature on the impact of crisis leaders on tackling such situations is "…characterized by a high degree of fragmentation, considerably hindering the generation of parsimonious theory and practically useful insights" (Schaedler et al 2021, p. 1).…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Crisis Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%