2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.989-994.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cr on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al–3.2Mg Alloys

Abstract: Effect of Cr element on microstructure of Al-3.2Mg alloys was investigated using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDS. Moreover, the tensile and hardness test were carried out. The results show that a minor additive of Cr can refine effectively the secondary dendrite arm spacing and decrease the number of coarse interdendritic structures. In the whole series of the alloys, the secondary dendrite arm spacing of Al–3.2Mg-0.1Cr alloy was the smallest, and the spacing presented an increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although direct methods of characterization, such as APT [40,41] and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), [42] are advantageous, solid solutions have been examined by indirect methods as well. These include microhardness measurements, [43] X-ray diffraction analysis, [44,45] ultrasonic analysis, [46] calorimetric measurements, [47] electrical resistivity measurements, [48] and positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. [48] While the direct methods allow nanoscale resolution, HRTEM is limited to the examination of very small regions in 2D while APT allows the characterization of larger regions in 3D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although direct methods of characterization, such as APT [40,41] and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), [42] are advantageous, solid solutions have been examined by indirect methods as well. These include microhardness measurements, [43] X-ray diffraction analysis, [44,45] ultrasonic analysis, [46] calorimetric measurements, [47] electrical resistivity measurements, [48] and positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. [48] While the direct methods allow nanoscale resolution, HRTEM is limited to the examination of very small regions in 2D while APT allows the characterization of larger regions in 3D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%