2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of core compaction on deformation capacity of FRP-jacketed concrete columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A criterion for design of the required lateral restraint to be provided by the jacket is the requirement that the strain capacity of the confined concrete ε cu,c should exceed the critical strain ε s,crit at the onset of reinforcement buckling. In this case (where ε cu,c > ε s,crit ), redistribution between the compressed bars at incipient buckling and the encased concrete is possible, thus postponing buckling to occur at a higher strain level (Tastani et al , Tastani et al ).The critical s / D b ratio that corresponds to the critical rebar stress f s,crit is given by s/ D b = ψ E t f s,crit where E t is the tangent modulus of steel at the stress level considered (see Fig. b and fib Bulletin 24 ) and y a parameter that accounts for the buckling length ( ψ = π/4 for symmetric buckling and ψ = π/2 for lateral buckling, see Fig.…”
Section: Detailing Provisions To Eliminate Brittle Failure Of the Jacketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A criterion for design of the required lateral restraint to be provided by the jacket is the requirement that the strain capacity of the confined concrete ε cu,c should exceed the critical strain ε s,crit at the onset of reinforcement buckling. In this case (where ε cu,c > ε s,crit ), redistribution between the compressed bars at incipient buckling and the encased concrete is possible, thus postponing buckling to occur at a higher strain level (Tastani et al , Tastani et al ).The critical s / D b ratio that corresponds to the critical rebar stress f s,crit is given by s/ D b = ψ E t f s,crit where E t is the tangent modulus of steel at the stress level considered (see Fig. b and fib Bulletin 24 ) and y a parameter that accounts for the buckling length ( ψ = π/4 for symmetric buckling and ψ = π/2 for lateral buckling, see Fig.…”
Section: Detailing Provisions To Eliminate Brittle Failure Of the Jacketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) and ( A criterion for design of the required lateral restraint to be provided by the jacket is the requirement that the strain capacity of the confined concrete e cu,c should exceed the critical strain e s,crit at the onset of reinforcement buckling. In this case (where e cu,c > e s,crit ), redistribution between the compressed bars at incipient buckling and the encased concrete is possible, thus postponing buckling to occur at a higher strain level (Tastani et al [23], Tastani et al [33]). The critical s/D b ratio that corresponds to the critical rebar stress f s,crit is given by…”
Section: Buckling Of Longitudinal Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies, starting with the study by Fardis and Kahalili [1] who conducted axial compressive tests on fiberglass tubes, have verified that the lateral confinement provided by FRP jackets places lateral dilated core concrete into a three-dimensional stress state, which significantly improves the axial compression and dilation behavior [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a significant amount of progress has been made that is reflected in the new Task Group 5.1 Bulletin 90 [4]. Especially Chapter 8, also presented in [5], summarizes design guidelines which are based on the comparative assessment of past models, requirements established from first principles and reference is made to the available experimental data ( [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and references therein). Alternative retrofit strategies for the seismic strengthening with composite materials are presented considering the overall response of the existing structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%