2016
DOI: 10.1002/suco.201500102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background to the European seismic design provisions for retrofitting RC elements using FRP materials

Abstract: This paper is a comprehensive background document on the state of the art in European seismic design provisions which was assembled by fib committee 5.1 to support the development of design guidelines regarding the use of externally applied fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) materials in the seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete structures. In the context of developing design guidelines, the underlying mechanistic models that support the derivation of provisions were assembled following critical evaluation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that nonlinear behavior of the retrofit is often controlled by the existing reinforcement anchorages, which may remain a weak zone of behavior even after rehabilitation, it is generally advisable that the ductility demand targeted for the structural system should not exceed the value of 2.5 [Pantazopoulou et al 2016].…”
Section: Interstorey Drift Envelopes For Retrofitting With Masonry Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that nonlinear behavior of the retrofit is often controlled by the existing reinforcement anchorages, which may remain a weak zone of behavior even after rehabilitation, it is generally advisable that the ductility demand targeted for the structural system should not exceed the value of 2.5 [Pantazopoulou et al 2016].…”
Section: Interstorey Drift Envelopes For Retrofitting With Masonry Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the non-circular FRP confined concrete, six stress-strain models were selected from the international codes provisions and recent literature: fib Bulletin 14 -Spoelstra and Monti (2001) [27], ACI 440 (2008) [28], CNR DT-200 (2013) [29], Biskinis and Fardis (2013) [16], Pantazopoulou et al (2016) [30] and Ghatte et al (2017) [24]. The main expressions for ultimate strength, fcu, and strain, εcu, of FRP confined concrete according to selected models are reported in Table 1 as a function of the unconfined concrete peak strength and corresponding strain, fc0 and εc0.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the state of the structures, it is not always possible to unload the columns by means of hydraulic jacks before applying the FRP sheets, and the intervention is often carried out under service load conditions that might induce significant modifications in the behavior of confined concrete under compression. Furthermore, so far the Design Codes provide specifications on the design retrofitting methods that allow improving the flexural, shear, and axial capacity of the concrete members but do not present design procedures able to take into account and consider the effects of existing load level on the confined compressive behavior …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, so far the Design Codes provide specifications on the design retrofitting methods that allow improving the flexural, shear, and axial capacity of the concrete members but do not present design procedures able to take into account and consider the effects of existing load level on the confined compressive behavior. [22][23][24][25] Based on the literature review, experimental works on the preloading action are available in the case of reinforcement with concrete jackets (two of the most popular can be found in References 26 and 27), while there are very few studies in the case of confinement with FRP [28][29][30][31][32] and this matter seems to be known because of the many different points of view of the various authors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%