2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2012.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cooling rate on precipitation during homogenization cooling in an excess silicon AlMgSi alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al (FeMnCr) Si phases were in agreement with the SEM and EDS analysis results. The Mg 2 Si and Mg 5 Si 6 were the strengthen phases that formed during the aging process [4,17,18]. And this matches the result of hardness (Figure 4) and the tensile strength discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Hardness Values and Microstructural Observationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The Al (FeMnCr) Si phases were in agreement with the SEM and EDS analysis results. The Mg 2 Si and Mg 5 Si 6 were the strengthen phases that formed during the aging process [4,17,18]. And this matches the result of hardness (Figure 4) and the tensile strength discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Hardness Values and Microstructural Observationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[116]. To identify these overlapping microstructural reactions, a relatively large body of work is available, e.g., [23,116,118,128,138,[170][171][172][173]. Figure 35 illustrates the authors' own work on quench-induced precipitation in 6005A at different cooling rates, showing optical micrographs (A), SEM secondary electron images (B) and TEM bright-field images (C) after cooling from solution treatment to the ambient temperature at different rates.…”
Section: XXX Almgsi Wrought Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ methods allowed direct observations of grain size variations without altering the test conditions, and they were successfully used in the characterization of microstructure evolutions of steels for the past few years. Bulk methods such as ultrasonic techniques [ 12 , 13 ] and the differential scanning calorimeter method [ 14 , 15 ] achieved fast and in situ grain size determinations with a few experiments, but the grain growths were not directly observed, and they should not be used independent of metallographic observations [ 16 ]. As a surface characterization method, the in situ observations [ 17 ] have gained much attention due to its directness, and it has been adopted in the researches of solidification [ 18 ], phase transformation [ 16 ], and the grain growth [ 1 ] of steels recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%