1982
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(82)90012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of continuous light on the incidence of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene induced mammary tumors in female Holtzman rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Hamilton [ 19691 reported increased tumor incidence under similar experimental conditions. Something similar was observed by Kothari et al [1982] in rats exposed to constant light at the time of birth. However, the interpretation of these observations is complicated by the fact that, whereas in the study of Kothari et al [1982] exposure to constant light resulted in formation of almost exclusively adenocarcinomas, 93% of tumors in the study of Hamilton [1969] were fibroadenomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Hamilton [ 19691 reported increased tumor incidence under similar experimental conditions. Something similar was observed by Kothari et al [1982] in rats exposed to constant light at the time of birth. However, the interpretation of these observations is complicated by the fact that, whereas in the study of Kothari et al [1982] exposure to constant light resulted in formation of almost exclusively adenocarcinomas, 93% of tumors in the study of Hamilton [1969] were fibroadenomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Something similar was observed by Kothari et al [1982] in rats exposed to constant light at the time of birth. However, the interpretation of these observations is complicated by the fact that, whereas in the study of Kothari et al [1982] exposure to constant light resulted in formation of almost exclusively adenocarcinomas, 93% of tumors in the study of Hamilton [1969] were fibroadenomas. It has been argued further that the observations of Kothari et al can be explained either on the basis of the stimulatory effects of light or inhibitory effects of short photoperiod or both [Blask, 19841, because the control animals were kept in short photoperiod (10 hr of light), which is stimulatory to the pineal gland.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Investigation of light effects on mammary tumorigenesis in rodents began in the 1960s . For both chemically induced and spontaneous tumors, most of these studies showed an increase in tumor incidence and number by exposure to a constantly lighted environment compared with a 24‐hour alternating schedule of light and dark (eg, 24 hours of light vs 12 hours of light:12 hours of dark).…”
Section: Animal Models Of Light and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of light effects on mammary tumorigenesis in rodents began in the 1960s. [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] For both chemically induced and spontaneous tumors, most of these studies showed an increase in tumor incidence and number by exposure to a constantly lighted environment compared with a 24-hour alternating schedule of light and dark (eg, 24 hours of light vs 12 hours of light:12 hours of dark). Beginning in the 1980s, researchers focused more closely on the ability of melatonin to inhibit mammary carcinogenesis and on the impact of a constant light environment in animal rooms on mammary tissue development, and major effects were reported.…”
Section: Animal Models Of Light and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the pineal gland on the development of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rodents has been studied usually in albino rats, in experiments that modified the levels of pineal function through manipulations such as: exposure to various photoperiods [Aubert et al, 1980;Bartsch and Bartsch, 1981;Hamilton, 1969;Kothari et al, 1982Kothari et al, , 1984Shah et al, 19841; surgical removal of the gland [Aubert et al, 1980;Kothari et al, 1984;Sinchez-Barcelo et al, 1988;Tamarkin et al, 1981, 19851; superior cervical ganglionectomy [ Chang et al, 1985, 19861; administration of pineal extracts [Dilman et al, 1979;Lapin and Ebels, 19761; or administration of melatonin, either in vivo [Aubert et al, 1980;Bartsch and Bartsch, 1981; Kothari, 1987;Shah et al, 1984;Tamarkin et al, 1981; Wrba et al, 19861 or in vitro [Blask and Hill, 19861. The parameters most frequently studied are the latency time of tumor appearance, their incidence, the number and size of tumors, and their rate of growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%