2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of conditioning temperature and retention time on pellet quality, ileal digestibility, and growth performance of broiler chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The durability values obtained in this study ranged from 67.48±2.00 to 77.63±1.77. These values are consistent with earlier research, which reported that the durability index of broiler starter feed pellets ranged from 66.48% to 87.16% [11].…”
Section: Durabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The durability values obtained in this study ranged from 67.48±2.00 to 77.63±1.77. These values are consistent with earlier research, which reported that the durability index of broiler starter feed pellets ranged from 66.48% to 87.16% [11].…”
Section: Durabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The current experiment was conducted during early spring and the diets were processed during a day with an average ambient temperature of <10°C. To achieve CT of 88°C, therefore, more heat (and moisture as heat was provided as steam) was applied ( dos Santos et al, 2020 ) to the diet. This may explain, at least in part, the atypically low enzyme recoveries observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is related to the presentation of the A feed that was in flour, since when that is the case, the ingredients are ground and mixed homogeneously. Whereas, for the granulates, the feed undergoes a process that combines high temperature and humidity, which improves the physical quality of the granule, increases the consumption of feed but affects the digestibility of nutrients such as amino acids and energy (Loar et al, 2014;dos Santos et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above is related to the presentation of the feed, since although treatment A had the lowest consumption because it was a flour, its nutrients were not affected by high temperatures. On the contrary, what happened with treatment B was that the consumption was so high that the CA was affected, which is related to the temperature of the pelletizing since it decreases the digestibility of nutrients (protein and energy) and it is known that birds eat to satisfy these requirements (Lesson and Summer, 2005;dos Santos et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%