1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0032833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of conditioned fear on tonic immobility in domestic chickens.

Abstract: Conducted 2 conditioned fear experiments with 36 and 14 Production Red chickens. Ss given brief exposure to a compound stimulus which had been previously paired with intense electric shock remained immobile significantly longer following manual restraint than Ss which received either shock only or the compound stimulus only during training. The administration of a tranquilizer (metoserpate hydrochloride, pacitran) reduced the effect of conditioned fear on the resulting duration of immobility. Results provide s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As found in studies of tonic immobility (Gallup, Nash, & Brown, 1971;Gallup, Rosen, & Brown, 1972), tranquilization decreased the probability of defensive responses, producing instead a predominance of social reinstatement behaviors (i.e., distress calling, attempting to escape from the open field).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As found in studies of tonic immobility (Gallup, Nash, & Brown, 1971;Gallup, Rosen, & Brown, 1972), tranquilization decreased the probability of defensive responses, producing instead a predominance of social reinstatement behaviors (i.e., distress calling, attempting to escape from the open field).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Pretest shock, which can be thought of as analogous to having been bitten, not only increases tonic immobility duration in many species (Edson & Gallup, 1972;Gallup, Creekmore, & Hill, 1970;Gallup, Nash, Potter, & Donegan, 1970), but also profoundly suppresses movement in both rodents and avians and vocalization in birds (Anderson, Crowell, Koehn, & Lupo, 1976; Baron, 1964;Blanchard & Blanchard, 1969;Gallup & Suarez, 1980; Levine, Madden, Conner, Moskal, & Anderson, 1973;Montevecchi et al, 1973;Pinel, Corcoran, & Malsbury, 1971). Similarly, a cue previously paired with shock, or which, by analogy, signals an impending predatory encounter, both prolongs tonic immobility (Gallup, Rosen, & Brown, 1972) and inhibits activity and vocalization in an open field (Bindra & Palfai, 1967;Gallup & Suarez, 1980;Mikulka, Kendall, Constantine, & Porterfield, 1972;Murai, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tonic immobility has been shown to be potentiated by stressproducing situations which generate fear reactions (2,3). The fact that birds which were never shocked remained immobile for an average of only 17.33 sec testifies to the considerable influence of aversive stimulation, even when controllable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies (e.g., Gallup, Rosen, & Brown, 1971) suggest that tonic immobility in the chicken may be an innate fear response which has evolved to meet the dernands of p r e d at o r-pr e y r elationships. The present study represents an attempt to look for comparable effects of e x p e r i m e n tally induced fear on immobility reactions in A.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%