Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

COVID-19 is pneumonia associated viral infection that originated from Wuhan city in December 2019. The virus appears to be spherical in appearance with proteins called spikes protruding from the surface. Ayurveda plays a vital role in boosting the immunity of our body against the pandemic outbreak COVID-19. The study aims to be aware of possible Ayurvedic treatment to prevent COVID-19. An online survey was conducted with a self-structured questionnaire using an online survey platform google forms. The link was shared through social media. A total of 100 responses were received. The responses recorded from the participants showed that the participants possess adequate knowledge about the covid-19 infection, and they possess sufficient awareness of the possible role of Ayurveda on boosting immunity against COVID-19. Around 68% of the respondents showed positive responses towards ayurvedic treatment to prevent COVID-19.Showing responses for questions about diet patterns, plays a vital role in preventing COVID19 - positive responses is 41%. The study concluded that during this pandemic outbreak, most of the participants are aware of the origin, cause, mode of the spread, treatment options and the initiatives taken by the government to prevent this pandemic. So, therefore, it concludes that Ayurveda plays a significant role in the process of boosting immunity against covid-19.

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Awareness on possible Ayurvedic treatment to prevent Covid-19 - A survey

Sutharshan

Sasanka

Lakshmanan

et al. 2020

“…Dentists signi ied the main root of information concerning dental implant therapy modality accompanied by friends and electronic media. (Ganapathy et al, 2017;Kannan and Venugopalan, 2018) (Duraisamy et al, 2019;Ganapathy et al, 2016) Previously our team had conducted numerous studies which include in vitro studies (Ajay et al, 2017), clinical trials (Ranganathan et al, 2017;Ashok et al, 2014;Venugopalan et al, 2014), a systematic review (Vijayalakshmi and Ganapathy, 2016) and epidemiological surveys (Ashok and Suvitha, 2016) and hence the aim of this study was to identify the preference of treatment choice from the implant and FPD (Basha et al, 2018) among patients in Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals. (Ariga et al, 2018;Selvan and Ganapathy, 2016;Subasree et al, 2016)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preference of patient opting for implant vs FPD

Dave¹,

Rakshagan²,

Ramakrishnan³

2020

Managing the demand, prevalence, and the design of partial tooth loss is imperative to recognize the prosthetic necessities of the patients. A factor that may affect prosthodontic work is the patients' awareness of the most advanced technologies in aesthetic dentistry. The choice of prosthetic replacement is largely defined by the patient's choice and budgetary status, accessible technology and expertise, as well as the number of missing teeth. The aim of this study was to identify the preference of treatment choice from implant and FPD for the patients treated at a private dental hospital. The sample size consisted of 1122 patients who had FPDs or implants. The case sheets of patients were obtained from the patient record system. The data of each patient was obtained and tabulated. In our study, 54.46 % of patients were male, 45.45 % of patients were female, and 0.09 % belonged to the transgender population. 3.21 % patients belong to the age group of less than 20 years, 54.06 % patients in the age group 21-40 years, 35.5 % patients in the age group 41-60 years and 7.2 % patients in the age group above 60 years. The overall FPD were 809 across all age groups with the maximum in the age group 21-40 years (40.59%). Overall implants were 312 across all age groups with the maximum at 21-40 years (13.47%). It was concluded that there is a significant difference in the preference of patients opting for implant vs FPD, in which FPD was highly opted by the patients. Although removable partial dentures extended to play a significant role in prosthetic teeth replacement, the use of FPDs and dental implants showed an increase in number.

“…which may require additional antibiotic coverage (Subasree et al, 2016;Vijayalakshmi and Ganapathy, 2016). Most common prosthetic replacements were ixed partial dentures or crowns in case of full mouth rehabilitation followed by implants (Ganapathy et al, 2017;Jain et al, 2017). The ixed partial dentures are being preferred by many because of low cost and time ef iciency (Ashok and Suvitha, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multidisciplinary Approach In Full Mouth Rehabilitation Treatments In University Based Setting- A Retrospective Study

Duraisamy

2020

Full mouth rehabilitation seeks to convert all unfavourable force to induce normal oral health. The restoration of normal shape, form, the function should always remain the prime goal in such an approach. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the role of multidisciplinary- approach in the treatment of full mouth rehabilitations. A retrospective data collection was done by analysing and reviewing the patient records from total 86000 case sheets from Saveetha dental college with the period between June 2019-march 2020. Inclusion criteria & exclusion criteria were available. Parameters were tabulated and analysed using SPSS software. There were totally 66 patients treated for full mouth rehabilitation in the study period. Among these, 22 were males and 44 were females .66% of both the population irrespective of age and gender had been treated with the involvement of 4 departments which includes periodontics, endodontics, oral surgery and prosthodontics. Chi-square t-test was performed, and the p-value was found to be 0.018 and the results show a significant relationship between age and the multidisciplinary treatment as p-value is <0.05. This study is in consensus with existing literature that full mouth rehabilitation treatment is to be done by a multidisciplinary approach rather than a single approach. Whether systemic health issues or socioeconomic reasons played a role in the acceptance of choice of treatment needs to be further evaluated with larger sample size and multicentre studies among our population.