2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1062359016060121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of clear-cutting on soil CO2 emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where W is the air velocity through the chamber (l/hour), M is the molar mass of CO2 (g/mol), z is the conversion factor from μg to g (10 -6 g/μg); S is the area of the horizontal section of the chamber (m 2 ), Vm is the molar volume of CO2 (l/mol), K is the temperature in Kelvin at standard conditions (273 K), T is the air temperature (°C). More information about the measurement method can be found in Molchanov et al (2017).…”
Section: Flux Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where W is the air velocity through the chamber (l/hour), M is the molar mass of CO2 (g/mol), z is the conversion factor from μg to g (10 -6 g/μg); S is the area of the horizontal section of the chamber (m 2 ), Vm is the molar volume of CO2 (l/mol), K is the temperature in Kelvin at standard conditions (273 K), T is the air temperature (°C). More information about the measurement method can be found in Molchanov et al (2017).…”
Section: Flux Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It cannot be used for representative flux measurements in areas with nonuniform vegetation distribution and complex topography. The chamber method can be used to measure soil and leaf GHG fluxes at experimental sites with highly heterogeneous topography and mosaic vegetation, but it does not allow flux averaging over a large area without a large number of simultaneous measurements on different experimental plots [8]. Considering the potential limitations of different in situ methods for regional flux estimation, remote sensing in this case can be a very useful tool for flux estimation over non-uniform land surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear-cutting is one of the most widespread logging practice, which can substantially transform energy, water vapor and CO 2 exchange between forest ecosystems and the atmosphere and affect the climate system at multiple scales. Effects of different logging practices as well as natural forest disturbances on vegetation-atmosphere interaction is a key topic of various experimental and modeling studies provided over the recent decades (Amiro et al 2010;Masek and Collatz 2006;Olchev et al 2009;Radler et al 2010;Coursolle et al 2012;Ma et al 2013;Molchanov et al 2017). Clear-cutting influences surface albedo, net radiation, surface roughness and consequently the energy flux partitioning into sensible (H), latent (LE) and soil heat fluxes (McCaughey 1985;Amiro 2001;Rannik et al 2002;Kowalski et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of previous experimental studies were performed at disturbed forest ecosystems in North America and Europe but effects of clear-cutting on ecosystem-atmosphere exchange in Russian boreal forests are still very poorly investigated and represented in a couple of experimental and modeling studies only (e.g. Machimura et al 2008;Mamkin et al 2016Mamkin et al , 2019Molchanov et al 2017). Boreal forests cover large areas in Russia and they are very sensitive to different natural and anthropogenic disturbances (zamolodchikov et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%