2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of citrate on Aspergillus niger phytase adsorption and catalytic activity in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At pH 7.5, repulsive forces between the negatively charged protein and soil surface lead to greater amounts and activities of the enzyme in solution , meaning that phyA should be soluble and available in the transgenic rhizosphere at pH 6.5. However, the pH optima of A. niger phyA activity in solution occurs at approximately pH 2.5 and 5.0 Sariyska et al 2005) and can decrease by more than 60% above pH 6 (Mezeli et al 2015;Naves et al 2012). Naves et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH 7.5, repulsive forces between the negatively charged protein and soil surface lead to greater amounts and activities of the enzyme in solution , meaning that phyA should be soluble and available in the transgenic rhizosphere at pH 6.5. However, the pH optima of A. niger phyA activity in solution occurs at approximately pH 2.5 and 5.0 Sariyska et al 2005) and can decrease by more than 60% above pH 6 (Mezeli et al 2015;Naves et al 2012). Naves et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of pH depicted that fungal strain (UJIIB-29) producing phytase grow at slightly acidic pH 5.5 (23.75±0.02 U/mL/min). The comparison of research and results of Qasim et al (2017), using Aspergillus tubingensis SKA (pH 5) and Mezeli et al (2017) who obtained maximum activity at pH 4.5-5.5 by Aspergillus niger showed that strains were isolated from acidic environment that is why they gave optimal results at acidic pH.…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a tradeoff between phytase retention to the soil matrix and phytase activity, whose outcome would determine the real contribution of the enzyme to soil P availability. A low retention of phytases implies more enzyme in the soil solution and eventually a faster release of soil organic P. On the other side, phytases in soil solution could be denatured by soil microorganisms (Yang and Chen, 2017), whereas retained phytases would be released gradually, providing additional available P at later stages (Mezeli et al, 2017). 180…”
Section: Phytase Adsorption On Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%