2017
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20160180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms

Abstract: The CBCT PA cephalogram was more accurate than the conventional PA cephalogram, and landmarks farther from the midline exhibited greater changes on cephalograms compared with those closer to the midline. Patients are at risk of improper positioning when undergoing extraoral radiography such as PA cephalograms. Changes in head position may affect the transverse measurements and thus the treatment plan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CBCT posterior‐anterior cephalograms are shown to be more accurate than conventionally obtained extraoral cephalograms, in which transverse measurements may be impacted by changes in head position and head movements 60 . In dental implant treatment planning, one of the most frequently reported applications of CBCT is the ability to obtain height and width linear measurements of the alveolar ridge 61‐75 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBCT posterior‐anterior cephalograms are shown to be more accurate than conventionally obtained extraoral cephalograms, in which transverse measurements may be impacted by changes in head position and head movements 60 . In dental implant treatment planning, one of the most frequently reported applications of CBCT is the ability to obtain height and width linear measurements of the alveolar ridge 61‐75 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT posterioranterior cephalograms are shown to be more accurate than conventionally obtained extraoral cephalograms, in which transverse measurements may be impacted by changes in head position and head movements. 60 In dental implant treatment planning, one of the most frequently reported applications of CBCT is the ability to obtain height and width linear measurements of the alveolar ridge. [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] CBCT images have been found to provide reliable bone quantity information for preoperative implant planning in different areas of the maxilla and mandible both in clinical and experimental studies.…”
Section: Use Of Cbct For Diagnosis and Treatment Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D images have not been considered the method of choice to detect asymmetries due to the superimposition of the bones, irregular structures of the middle face and differences in head position during X‐ray exposition. In all cases, errors are generated to landmark identification and measurements …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT was introduced for dentistry in 1988, and it is currently an ideal imaging modality for many dental appli-cations. This modality has superiority over conventional CT mainly owing to having a lower patient radiation dose, lower cost and higher spatial resolution.CBCT also enables reconstruction of twodimensional (2D) views from three-dimensional (3D) images for conventional cephalometric analysis [19].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%