2013
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cereal grain type and corn grain harvesting and processing methods on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows through a meta-analysis

Abstract: A meta-analysis was performed to determine the influence of cereal grain type and corn grain harvesting and processing methods, dietary starch, rumen-digestible starch, and forage NDF concentrations on intake, digestion, and lactation performance by dairy cows using a data set comprising 414 treatment means from 102 peer-reviewed journal reports from 2000 to 2011. Categories for corn processing were dry ground, cracked or rolled corn (DRY), high-moisture shelled or ear corn (ENS), and steam-flaked or -rolled c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
158
3
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
14
158
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that this protein matrix by blocking the absorption sites or by inluencing enzyme binding may reduce the surface availability of starch to host enzyme and ruminal bacteria [25]. In addition, the results of several studies have shown that hydrophobic properties of grain protein matrix, associated with type and location of proteins, could be responsible for the diferences in starch digestion between rapidly digested grains such as wheat, barley, and rice, and slowly digested grains such as maize and sorghum [2,24]. Processing is necessary for feed grains to break the protective seed coat [3,5] especially for the grains such as maize and sorghum [11], and the ibrous hull in case of barley and oats, to improve their digestibility in the digestive tract of animals [5].…”
Section: Role Of Grain Processing In Starch Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that this protein matrix by blocking the absorption sites or by inluencing enzyme binding may reduce the surface availability of starch to host enzyme and ruminal bacteria [25]. In addition, the results of several studies have shown that hydrophobic properties of grain protein matrix, associated with type and location of proteins, could be responsible for the diferences in starch digestion between rapidly digested grains such as wheat, barley, and rice, and slowly digested grains such as maize and sorghum [2,24]. Processing is necessary for feed grains to break the protective seed coat [3,5] especially for the grains such as maize and sorghum [11], and the ibrous hull in case of barley and oats, to improve their digestibility in the digestive tract of animals [5].…”
Section: Role Of Grain Processing In Starch Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed grains containing starch such as corn, wheat, barley, and sorghum, as a primary source of energy, are commonly fed to livestock to improve meat or milk productions [1]. Improving starch utilization may improve lactation performance in cows and reduce feed costs, especially when grain price is high [2]. Whole grain with an intact pericarp is largely or entirely resistant to digestion by ruminants because whole kernels are resistant to bacterial and host enzyme accessing to endosperm of grain kernel in the rumen and in the intestine, respectively [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of scientific research to evaluate the dietary effects of corn and wheat has been carried out in dairy cows (reviewed by Ferraretto et al, 2013). Some comparative studies have also been conducted with beef cattle but, in most of them, the concentrates also included monensin, which is currently banned in Europe and can mask the effects of different cereals on ruminal fermentation (Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alto milho diminuiu o teor de gordura do leite de 3,38 para 3,26% (P=0,04) e aumentou o teor de proteína de 2,99 para 3,03% (P=0,05) e a eficiência alimentar de 1,50 para 1,57kg de leite/kg de consumo (P=0,03). Em meta-analise realizada por Ferraretto et al (2013) avaliando 414 trabalhos, relatou redução no teor de gordura do leite de 3,59% para 3,41% nos animais alimentados com silagem de grão úmido em comparação com milho maduro moído, não foi relatada alteração no teor da proteína do leite.…”
Section: Revisão Bibliográficaunclassified