2007
DOI: 10.1080/00908310600710715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Carbonization Temperature on Combustion Reactivity of Bagasse Char

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, along with a decrease in T f and fuel ratio, removal of extractives surprisingly increased the reactivity of PE RAW hydrochars. While this matter requires further probing, clearly changes to char composition and morphology, e.g., increased surface area and/or pore size (Figure ), through extraction allowed for a more rapid oxidation. , Removal of the secondary char from the surface of the hydrochars may have increased exposure of active sites to oxygen, the effect of which was more pronounced for the relatively more degraded fibrous structure of PE RAW hydrochars. Varying composition and quantity of catalytic species, such as inorganic matter, where extraction concentrated their presence (c.f.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, along with a decrease in T f and fuel ratio, removal of extractives surprisingly increased the reactivity of PE RAW hydrochars. While this matter requires further probing, clearly changes to char composition and morphology, e.g., increased surface area and/or pore size (Figure ), through extraction allowed for a more rapid oxidation. , Removal of the secondary char from the surface of the hydrochars may have increased exposure of active sites to oxygen, the effect of which was more pronounced for the relatively more degraded fibrous structure of PE RAW hydrochars. Varying composition and quantity of catalytic species, such as inorganic matter, where extraction concentrated their presence (c.f.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrolysis processes are classified under three main categories; slow pyrolysis, rapid (or flash) pyrolysis at high temperatures, and flash pyrolysis at low temperatures [ 61 ]. The most commonly used pyrolysis process among them in present times is flash pyrolysis.…”
Section: Description Of the Existing Waste-to-energy Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used pyrolysis process among them in present times is flash pyrolysis. This is because the slow pyrolysis process requires a very long period of time (many hours) and yields bio-char as the primary product, while flash pyrolysis produces about 60% bio-oil in only a few seconds [ 61 , 62 ]. Most pyrolysis technologies are environmentally friendly ways of converting feedstock; however, if the right measures are not taken, they can cause adverse environmental and health issues.…”
Section: Description Of the Existing Waste-to-energy Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy produced through thermochemical processes can be used in automotive engines for power production. In the thermochemical conversion process of biomass combustion technologies, pyrolysis technologies and gasification technologies are employed [41]. The main advantages of thermochemical conversion processes are fewer emissions of greenhouse gases, the processing time is short, various feedstocks can be used and small footprints [42].…”
Section: Thermochemical Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%