The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62379-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of carbon source on the denitrification in constructed wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present experiment, mean value of COD/ NO À 3 -N in the fed wastewater was only 2.0, and a significant fraction of the organic matter would be biodegraded within the upper layer of the down-flow chamber [38,39]. Therefore, limited carbon source for denitrification and accumulations of NO À 3 -N and NO À 2 -N in the wetland beds could be expected, which was in accordance with other references [20,36,40,41].…”
Section: Insufficient Carbon Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present experiment, mean value of COD/ NO À 3 -N in the fed wastewater was only 2.0, and a significant fraction of the organic matter would be biodegraded within the upper layer of the down-flow chamber [38,39]. Therefore, limited carbon source for denitrification and accumulations of NO À 3 -N and NO À 2 -N in the wetland beds could be expected, which was in accordance with other references [20,36,40,41].…”
Section: Insufficient Carbon Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Biological denitrification is highly depended on temperature [1,25,31,36,43], and it was reported to slow down below 15˚C and nearly cease below 5˚C due to the drastically dropped activities of denitrifying bacteria [11]. In our experiment, the sharp decrease of NO À 3 -N removal rate observed in January ( Fig.…”
Section: Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is different from the report of Im et al (2014), in which study the ammonia-oxidising bacteria played a crucial role. DO values and carbon sources were two crucial factors in denitrification (Ingersoll and Baker 1998;Lu et al 2009). The DO level of VBF inflow is satisfactory; however, the removal rate of carbon sources fails to reach the standard.…”
Section: Nitrogen Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRRs show a positive response to increasing the HLR for both the VSSF and HSSF wetland units with all pollutants, except for NO3 − -N in the VSSF unit. This negative response for NO3 − -N MRRs in the VSSF unit is believed to be a result of the enhanced nitrification and incomplete denitrification under an oxic environment and lack of a suitable carbon source [30]. The regression analysis confirmed these observations, with a strong linear correlation between MLRs and MRRs for BOD5, TSS, FC, TC, and NH4 + -N, of over 0.9 in both wetland units; a moderate correlation for NO3 − -N (R 2 = 0.743) in the HSSF wetland unit; and a weak relationship for NO3 − -N in the VSSF wetland unit (R 2 = 0.25).…”
Section: Drainage Stream Water Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%