2019
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of carbamide peroxide bleaching agent on the surface roughness and gloss of a pressable ceramic

Abstract: Objective This study evaluated the influence of carbamide peroxide, 10% and 16%, on the surface roughness and gloss of a pressable ceramic. Materials and Methods Carbamide peroxide (10% or 16%) was applied for 4 hours or 3 hours per day for 14 days, respectively, in pressable ceramic discs (14 mm × 2 mm). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C. Surface roughness and gloss were determined before carbamide peroxide application (T0), 7 days (T7) and 14 days (T14) after the initial treatment. ANOVA was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These roughness changes were not statistically significant and were less than the clinically important cutoff point of 0.30 μm (de Selva , 2006). In several studies, it has been shown that CP gel at different concentrations, including 10, 16, and 35%, increased the surface roughness of dental ceramics (Moraes et al, 2006;Rea et al, 2019;Vanderlei et al, 2010). However, in Turker et al's study, no changes were observed with CP 10% gel at three different pH values (Turker & Biskin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These roughness changes were not statistically significant and were less than the clinically important cutoff point of 0.30 μm (de Selva , 2006). In several studies, it has been shown that CP gel at different concentrations, including 10, 16, and 35%, increased the surface roughness of dental ceramics (Moraes et al, 2006;Rea et al, 2019;Vanderlei et al, 2010). However, in Turker et al's study, no changes were observed with CP 10% gel at three different pH values (Turker & Biskin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bleaching is applied in-office, esthetic restorations will have adequate protection. However, if the bleaching is done at home, the bleaching agent might contact the restorations, and the restorations might be damaged (17). Little is known about the influence of bleaching agents on new chairside CAD/CAM materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes can be caused by chemical reactions between the bleaching agent and dental materials (18). A reduction in microhardness due to organic matrix erosion might affect the surface properties (e.g., surface energy, roughness and gloss) of materials and influence the durability of restorations (2,17). The increase in surface roughness of material surfaces can cause discoloration, biofilm accumulation, and increased wear (1,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolution of dental ceramics is dependent on the chemical environment (acidic, neutral or alkaline), mechanical environment (loading) or their combination 18 . Chemical resistance is an important property because ceramics can undergo degradation in the presence of solutions with different pH values 19 …”
Section: Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Chemical resistance is an important property because ceramics can undergo degradation in the presence of solutions with different pH values. 19 Acids, such as hydrochloric acid and acetic acid, are used to test the chemical stability of dental materials; ISO 6872 stipulates that acetic acid should be used in chemical stability tests. 15,17 Acids are an excellent testing medium compared to saliva or distilled water because they cause faster material dissolution, thus allowing assessment of the long-term stability of dental ceramics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%