2010
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1227.1231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Capture Method on Hematological and Serum Biochemical Values of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been observed for blood glucose and urea in dairy cows fed RPM (Blum et al 1999). The values of glucose, cholesterol, urea, creatinine and TP in this experiment were similar to those previously reported for red deer (Topal et al 2010). There was a trend to increase blood cholesterol by increasing the dose of methionine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar results have been observed for blood glucose and urea in dairy cows fed RPM (Blum et al 1999). The values of glucose, cholesterol, urea, creatinine and TP in this experiment were similar to those previously reported for red deer (Topal et al 2010). There was a trend to increase blood cholesterol by increasing the dose of methionine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It exhibited much higher in the female Chinese water deer, but it had found the opposite tendency in fallow deer (Dama dama L.) and rusa deer (Rusa timorensis) [15,27]. The CK value was found increasing rapidly when physical capture instead of chemical capture in red deer [13,28]. Compared to fallow deer and rusa deer, the stress response of female was stronger in Chinese water deer [15,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macropods (which includes wallabies) are known to be highly susceptible to stress-related diseases such as capture myopathy when restrained for attaching sensors [12][13][14]. Capture-related stress has also been widely documented for red deer and is affected by capture method, with physical restraint usually shown to be more stressful than chemical immobilisation [15,16]. Therefore, any research requiring the capture and deployment of animal sensors needs to consider the efficacy and animal welfare impacts of the methods used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%