2017
DOI: 10.9734/ajeba/2017/36075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Capital Formation on Economic Growth in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, bi-directional causal link has been found between capital accumulation and economic growth in developed countries. This finding is consistent with Ahmed et al (2016), Narayan and Smyth (2008), Neanywa and Makhenyane (2016), Satti et al (2014), Onyinye et al (2017) and Topcu et al (2020), Uneze (2013) . In developed countries, there is bi-directional causality between labour and economic growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, bi-directional causal link has been found between capital accumulation and economic growth in developed countries. This finding is consistent with Ahmed et al (2016), Narayan and Smyth (2008), Neanywa and Makhenyane (2016), Satti et al (2014), Onyinye et al (2017) and Topcu et al (2020), Uneze (2013) . In developed countries, there is bi-directional causality between labour and economic growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Further, Granger causality test results reveals that the causal relationship between Islamic banks' investments and the economic growth. Onyinye, Idenyi, & Ifeyinwa (2017) explore the effect of nonlife insurance on economic growth in Nigeria for the period 1988-2014. The study used ordinary least square regression for the testing of the hypotheses.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussion and Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…YG t = c + αKG t + βLG t + e t (5) (c: constant or intercept, e t : error term) Based on the previous analysis and the previous studies such as Bayar [29] and [33], Emara and Jhonsa [34], Bouoiyour and Naimbayel [35], Fayissa and Nsiah [36], Pere [22], Orayo and Mose [37], Lahouij [27], Onyinye, et al [38], Josheski, et al [39], Razmi and Refaei [26] and Berggren and Jordahl [40], this study will estimate the following regression model: YG it = β 0 + β 1 KF it + β 2 LF it + β 3 OT it + β 4 EF it + β 5 VA it + β 6 PS it + β 7 GE it + β 8 RQ it + β 9 RL it + β 10 CC it + λ DM it + u it (6) Where β 0 : intercept, i: country, t: year, u it : random error term, YG: growth rate of RGDP, KF: gross fixed capital formation to GDP ratio, LF: labor force growth rate, OT: trade openness that is measured by the sum of exports and imports to GDP ratio, and EF: economic freedom index. Governance variables are: VA: voice and accountability, PS: political stability, GE: government effectiveness, RQ: regulatory quality, RL: rule of law, and CC: control of corruption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%