2014
DOI: 10.21608/jfds.2014.52740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Camel Milk on Microbiological and Chemical Quality of Soft Cheese

Abstract: Soft cheese made from buffaloes milk mixed with camel milk at different concentrations (90, 80, 70, 60 %) and (10, 20, 30, 40 %) respectively, the soft cheese (control and their treatments) were stored for 60 days at 4 0 C. The chemical composition, microbiological and organoleptic properties were determined for all soft cheese samples during storage periods (fresh, 30, 45 and 60 days). The chemical compositions results showed that the values of total solids, fat, total protein and ash were increased with incr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings obtained are similar to those made by Bassuony et al . (2014) who made soft cheese by blending camel milk with buffalo milk at varying percentages (90%, 80%, 70%, 60%and 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, respectively). The different levels (20%, 30% and 40%) of camel milk prompted the disappearance of coliform bacteria and fungi after a month of storage at 4°C, while a level of 10% camel milk completed eradicated fungi after 60 days of storage at 4°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings obtained are similar to those made by Bassuony et al . (2014) who made soft cheese by blending camel milk with buffalo milk at varying percentages (90%, 80%, 70%, 60%and 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, respectively). The different levels (20%, 30% and 40%) of camel milk prompted the disappearance of coliform bacteria and fungi after a month of storage at 4°C, while a level of 10% camel milk completed eradicated fungi after 60 days of storage at 4°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,35,41,42 On the contrary, a high mean count was determined by others. 29,30,33,34,37 On the other side Bassuony IN et al, 32 reported a much higher detection rate of coliforms (85.7%) out of 35 raw camel milk samples from Matrouh Governorate, Egypt. Our findings demonstrated that 51% of the examined samples were found to be contaminated with Enterobacteriaceae with mean count of 2.91x10 4 ±6.20x10 3 cfu/ ml with a maximum count of 6.70x10 5 cfu/ml.…”
Section: Total Coliform and Enterobacteriaceae Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, nearly similar results were previously reported by several authors elsewhere. [29][30][31][32][33][34] In contrast, a lower bacterial burden was given in other studies. 20,35,36 In fact, The TBC of camel milk has been reported with values varied from 10 2 to 10 8 cfu/ml.…”
Section: Total Bacterial Content (Tbc) Of Camel Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in raw dromedary camel milk was 24% of 33 samples in the Qassim region in middle Saudi Arabia, 0.4% of 40 samples in Al-Alhsa Governorate, Saudi Arabia, 13% of 31 samples in Southern Morocco and 30.5% of 104 samples from Garissa County, Kenya was reported by (EL-Ziny and AL-Turki 2013;El-Demerdash and Al-Otaibi 2012;Ismaili et al 2016;Noor et al 2020). On the other hand, Aly and Elewa (2014) and Bassuony et al (2014) reported that Salmonella spp. could not found in Egyptian raw camel milk samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%