2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Calibration and Validation Decisions on Streamflow Modeling for a Heterogeneous and Low Runoff–Producing River Basin in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…O SWAT é um software de domínio público, desenvolvido com o objetivo de predizer os impactos das mudanças no uso e manejo do solo atual e futuro, através da simulação de cenários, na produção de água, sedimentos, nutrientes e agroquímicos em bacias hidrográficas (Arnold et al, 1998;Gassman et al, 2007). No entanto, para que os resultados disponibilizados pelo modelo possam ser utilizados com confiabilidade, torna-se necessário calibrá-lo, ou seja, ajustar os dados simulados aos dados observados (Abbaspour et al, 2017;Paz et al, 2018;Premand et al, 2018;Ashikary et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…O SWAT é um software de domínio público, desenvolvido com o objetivo de predizer os impactos das mudanças no uso e manejo do solo atual e futuro, através da simulação de cenários, na produção de água, sedimentos, nutrientes e agroquímicos em bacias hidrográficas (Arnold et al, 1998;Gassman et al, 2007). No entanto, para que os resultados disponibilizados pelo modelo possam ser utilizados com confiabilidade, torna-se necessário calibrá-lo, ou seja, ajustar os dados simulados aos dados observados (Abbaspour et al, 2017;Paz et al, 2018;Premand et al, 2018;Ashikary et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The LSTM‐All model achieved comparable results to the monthly calibrated SWAT model for five out of six watersheds (which are the same as the present study, with the NSE difference of 0.07–0.12) and outperformed the monthly calibrated VIC model (Figure 8b,c and Table S5). The daily LSTM model performed poorly for the watershed (Alladupalli and Singhavaram, Pennar catchment) in a semi‐arid climate zone compared to the monthly calibrated SWAT and VIC model (Adhikary et al, 2019). This suggests that in semi‐arid climate zones where precipitation has higher variability and hydrologic processes are complex, the LSTM model may not be suitable, and a process‐based model is a viable option.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S5). The daily LSTM model performed poorly for the watershed (Alladupalli and Singhavaram, Pennar catchment) in a semi-arid climate zone compared to the monthly calibrated SWAT and VIC model (Adhikary et al, 2019). This suggests that in semi-arid climate zones where precipitation has higher variability and hydrologic processes are complex, the LSTM model may not be suit- and À41% to À15%, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Data Length On Model Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…With the use of distinct sets of sensitive parameter values, the multisite calibration methodology under a physio-climatically heterogeneous environment shows discrepancies in the hydrological behavior of the basin's upstream and downstream sections [16]. Therefore, the model's performance at different outlets may be compromised, thereby balancing the targeted threshold of the objective function during the multisite calibration approach [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%