2020
DOI: 10.26848/rbgf.v13.2.p576-594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibração hidrológica do modelo SWAT em bacia hidrográfica caracterizada pela expansão do cultivo da cana-de-açúcar

Abstract: A dificuldade na gestão de recursos hídricos aliada à dinâmica do uso e ocupação do solo em bacias hidrográficas agrícolas são fatores relevantes para a conservação da água e solo. A gestão de bacias hidrográficas, bem como o monitoramento de cenários de expansão agrícola e mudança no uso do solo, podem se beneficiar de ferramentas de modelagem hidrossedimentológica, como o SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool). Entretanto, para que os resultados obtidos sejam confiáveis, os modelos precisam ser calibrados. Ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration and validation of streamflow data (Figure 3) produced satisfactory NS, PBIAS (percent bias), and RSR (ratio of the root mean square error) values (Table 8). Similar values of these indices for the calibration of the SWAT model have been reported in several studies in Brazilian watersheds (Pereira et al, 2014;Fukunaga et al, 2015;Brighenti;Bonumá;Chaffe, 2016;Blainski et al, 2017;Paz et al, 2018;Martins et al, 2020).…”
Section: Swat Model Calibration Validation and Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The calibration and validation of streamflow data (Figure 3) produced satisfactory NS, PBIAS (percent bias), and RSR (ratio of the root mean square error) values (Table 8). Similar values of these indices for the calibration of the SWAT model have been reported in several studies in Brazilian watersheds (Pereira et al, 2014;Fukunaga et al, 2015;Brighenti;Bonumá;Chaffe, 2016;Blainski et al, 2017;Paz et al, 2018;Martins et al, 2020).…”
Section: Swat Model Calibration Validation and Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/earth3030042/s1, Figure S1: Annual mean water yield for each climate condition and each LULC scenario; Figure S2: Annual mean streamflow into the basin's outlet reach for each climate condition and each LULC scenario; Figure S3: Annual mean groundwater contribution to streamflow for each climate condition and each LULC scenario; Table S1: Confusion matrix used to assess the accuracy of the land use map; Table S2: Sources of climate data and the weather dataset combinations analyzed; Table S3: Plant growth factors altered according to regional studies; Table S4: Initial plant growth parameters altered according to regional studies; Table S5: Universal soil loss Equation C factor altered according to regional studies; Table S6: Universal soil loss Equation C factor altered according to regional studies; Table S7: Parameters altered to represent best management practices adopted in pasture areas in the land use scenarios of the focal conservation and the combined solutions; Table S8: List of NEX-GDDP models used for the mean multi-model ensemble; Table S9: Streamflow stations and periods used for calibration and validation; Table S10: More sensitive parameters according to global sensitivity analysis for each streamflow gauge; Table S11: Parameters used for calibrating the base model, original values, modification range applied, and final fitted value and the respective sub-basin of application; Table S12: Performance statistics of base model calibration and validation for monthly streamflow. References [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological model Soil Water Assessment Tools-SWAT is very widespread in Brazil and due to the need for adjustments in the results obtained through modeling and observed data, it is necessary to carry out a calibration. Different studies have been developed to calibrate the swat model to Brazil, [2,13,23,27] northeast of Brazil, [11], and for the Pernambuco basins [1,5,11,[24][25][26]. The intention was and is to provide a system that can facilitate the monitoring and planning of watersheds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%