2018
DOI: 10.1190/geo2017-0077.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of brine-CO2 fracture flow on velocity and electrical resistivity of naturally fractured tight sandstones

Abstract: Fracture networks inside geological CO 2 storage reservoirs can serve as primary fluid flow conduit, particularly in low-permeability formations. While some experiments focused on the geophysical properties of brine-and CO 2 -saturated rocks during matrix flow, geophysical monitoring of fracture flow when CO 2 displaces brine inside the fracture seems to be overlooked.We have conducted laboratory geophysical monitoring of fluid flow in a naturally fractured tight sandstone during brine and liquid CO 2 injectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensuring a safe and secure fullscale geologic CO 2 sequestration requires comprehensive analyses of coupled hydrologic-geomechanical-geochemical processes that control fate of the CO 2 plume in subsurface (Rutqvist, 2012). Among other considerations, implementing various monitoring techniques is a necessity for establishing a reliable long-term operation (Wurdemann et al, 2010;Nooraiepour et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensuring a safe and secure fullscale geologic CO 2 sequestration requires comprehensive analyses of coupled hydrologic-geomechanical-geochemical processes that control fate of the CO 2 plume in subsurface (Rutqvist, 2012). Among other considerations, implementing various monitoring techniques is a necessity for establishing a reliable long-term operation (Wurdemann et al, 2010;Nooraiepour et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include the distinction between pore pressure and pore fluid distribution effects (Falcon‐Suarez et al, 2016, 2017, 2018), the frequency dependence of elastic wave properties and the methodology to upscale information collected in laboratory (Lei & Xue, 2009; Mikhaltsevitch et al, 2014; Nakagawa et al, 2013), or the effect of mineralogical changes in the elastic and transport properties of the rock (Canal et al, 2013; Hangx et al, 2010, 2015; Vialle et al, 2014; Vialle & Vanorio, 2011). However, most of these studies are restricted to nonfractured rocks (Nooraiepour et al, 2018), although the nucleation and reactivation of fractures endanger safe GCS (Rutqvist, 2012; Velcin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, we find experimental approaches based on multidirectional array measurement using a single core plug (e.g., Wang, 2002;Kovalyshen et al, 2018), and several cores extracted at different angles (with respect to the formation bedding) from the same rock (e.g., Louis et al, 2004;Best et al, 2007;Martínez and Schmitt, 2013;Falcon-Suarez et al, 2017a). For resistivity anisotropy determinations, we also find the single-core (Guo et al, 2011;North et al, 2013;North and Best, 2014;Falcon-Suarez et al, 2017cBayrakci et al, 2018;Nooraiepour et al, 2018) and multi-coring (e.g., Wang et al, 2009;Falcon-Suarez et al, 2017a) experimental strategies. The use of several plugs implies relying the uniformity of adjacent plugs is preserved (i.e., absolute homogeneity of precursor specimen), which in practice is impossible to guarantee (Best et al, 2007); but, unlike the single-core, this method is easily implemented using conventional equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A number of works have addressed the integration of elastic waves and resistivity properties of rock samples under reservoir conditions, at the laboratory (centimetric) scale. They include general characterizations of common (sandstones and carbonates) reservoir formations (Louis et al, 2003(Louis et al, , 2004Wang et al, 2009;Wang and Gelius, 2010;Han et al, 2011aHan et al, , b, 2018Falcon-Suarez et al, 2019), pore fluid distribution monitoring during CO2 geosequestration (Alemu et al, 2013;Falcon-Suarez et al, 2016, 2017bNooraiepour et al, 2018), methane hydrate formation (Sahoo et al, 2018;Attias et al, 2020) and the assessment of secondary (alteration) mineralization (e.g., the degree of serpentinization of mafic/ultramafic rocks (Falcon-Suarez et al, 2017c;Bayrakci et al, 2018)). Commonly, these studies assess the stress dependency of both parameters under defined states of stress and pore fluid conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%