1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4488(95)00744-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of breed and milking method on somatic cell count, standard plate count and composition of goat milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest content (P < 0.05) of the total protein in goat and sheep milk was consistently observed in the final stage of lactation in accordance with Chornobai et al (1999), Aganga et al (2002), Soryal et al (2005), and Kuchtík et al (2008). The initial higher protein content reported by Zeng and Escobar (1996) was not recorded as the samples were taken after the colostrum period.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Total and Acid Whey Proteinssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The highest content (P < 0.05) of the total protein in goat and sheep milk was consistently observed in the final stage of lactation in accordance with Chornobai et al (1999), Aganga et al (2002), Soryal et al (2005), and Kuchtík et al (2008). The initial higher protein content reported by Zeng and Escobar (1996) was not recorded as the samples were taken after the colostrum period.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Total and Acid Whey Proteinssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…breed, lineage, system of feeding, milking, differences between individual animals, health status and age, seasonal changes, order and stage of lactation, life conditions and technology of keeping the animals, and processing the milk (Zeng & Escobar 1996;Meschy et al 2000;Soryal et al 2005;Morand-Fehr et al 2007). Knowles et al (1997) claims, that I and Se concentrations in cow milk can be quite easily manipulated by supplementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In goats, involution tends to be spontaneous and is associated with an increase of SCC independently of IMI, which confounds the interrelationship between IMI and milk yield (Wilson et al 1995;Zeng & Escobar, 1996;Foschino et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%