2009
DOI: 10.1080/09507110902836952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bonding conditions on joints of 5052Al and 6063Al in pulsed electric current bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equipment is composed of a pulsed electric power source, hydraulic pressure system, vacuum chamber/evacuation system and thermal controller. 12 The Al6061 and SS304 discs were placed between graphite punches with an inserted aluminium powder as shown in the magnified section in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The equipment is composed of a pulsed electric power source, hydraulic pressure system, vacuum chamber/evacuation system and thermal controller. 12 The Al6061 and SS304 discs were placed between graphite punches with an inserted aluminium powder as shown in the magnified section in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Pulsed electric current sintering (PECS) 9,10 is a novel fast sintering process, by which powder can be rapidly heated and sintered in a relatively low temperature. At present, researchers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] have attempted to introduce this process into the welding field called PECS bonding. Kondou et al 12 systematically studied the effect of bonding conditions on joints of 5052Al and 6063Al in PECS bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was presumed that the oxide film was destroyed by direct energization on the contact surface, and a good joint with no inclusions was obtained. There are some examples regarding the report of joining dissimilar metal by the pulsed current under low vacuum lesser than below 10 Pa. 20,22) 3.4 XRD analysis of fractured surface Figure 7 shows the XRD pattern of the OFC and SUS304 fractured surfaces. The diffraction line of Cr 23 C 6 was detected on the SUS304.…”
Section: Observation Of the Cross-sectional Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPS, also referred to as pulsed electric current sintering (PECS) or field assisted sintering technique (FAST), has recently gained popularity for sintering powdered metals and ceramics 22 and has also been used to successfully bond metals and ceramics. [23][24][25][26][27] The primary difference between an SPS press and a hot press is that the SPS press applies a large pulsed dc current density on the order of 1000A/cm 2 to the samples to be bonded in order to rapidly heat them via localized resistive heating instead of using an external heat source. Other benefits of using SPS processes over other traditional bonding techniques include faster heating and cooling rates, a lower overall sintering temperature, and much shorter holding times to achieve similar results to hot presses.…”
Section: Bonding Via Spark Plasma Sintering (Sps) Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%