2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb01608.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Body Position on the 6‐Lead ECG of Dogs

Abstract: ECGs recorded from dogs show characteristic morphology and changes in morphology with various disease states. These changes are determined by comparing individual recordings to reference ranges established from recordings obtained from normal dogs in right lateral (RL) recumbency. Using these reference ranges for ECGs recorded from dogs in other positions may not be valid. We compared ECG complexes from 39 normal dogs obtained in RL, left lateral (LL), and standing (ST) body positions. ECGs from dogs in ST pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
40
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show that it is important to evaluate MEA in an electrocardiogram with filters disabled because it will show a greater accuracy independently of the methods used to calculate the mean electrical axis, although MEA did not show significant differences between recumbencies, in contrast to results obtained in dogs (Rishniw et al, 2002) and cats (Harvey et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings show that it is important to evaluate MEA in an electrocardiogram with filters disabled because it will show a greater accuracy independently of the methods used to calculate the mean electrical axis, although MEA did not show significant differences between recumbencies, in contrast to results obtained in dogs (Rishniw et al, 2002) and cats (Harvey et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The other 3 causes might have been produced in our study, especially the shifting of the electrodes, as they were again placed between the two electrocardiograms (sternal and dorsal recumbencies). Regarding body position, previous researchers in dogs (Hanton and Rabemampianina, 2006) or New Zealand rabbits (Saitanov, 1960) did not show differences according to this factor, although other researchers did (Rishniw et al, 2002;Harvey et al, 2005). In our research, body position should be taken into account when the J-T segment duration is assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies did not show significant differences in ECG obtained in standing and right lateral position with the exception of the mean electrical axis (Rishniw et al 2002, Pasławska et al 2005. Nine-lead surface electrocardiogram was recorded for each patient to analyse heart rhythm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In many publications the ECG records were compared coming from dogs that were in lateral recumbency or standing position. It has been noticed that the position of the dog does not influence the P-wave duration, P-wave amplitude or PR interval [15,16]. Dogs standing position is used also during toxicological and pharmacological examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%