2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and disinclusion buttons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, when the tooth surfaces were contaminated, and no decontamination was performed the bond strength values fell significantly when compared with the Control Group that presented a mean of 4.78 MPa. This bond strength value is lower than the clinically accepted one, which is in agreement with previous investigations (OONSOMBAT et al, 2003;CACCIAFESTA et al, 2004b;SFONDRINI et al, 2004;SFONDRINI et al, 2010). This demonstrates the need for decontaminating the enamel surface before bonding when the material of choice is Transbond XT, since this material has no affinity for humidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, when the tooth surfaces were contaminated, and no decontamination was performed the bond strength values fell significantly when compared with the Control Group that presented a mean of 4.78 MPa. This bond strength value is lower than the clinically accepted one, which is in agreement with previous investigations (OONSOMBAT et al, 2003;CACCIAFESTA et al, 2004b;SFONDRINI et al, 2004;SFONDRINI et al, 2010). This demonstrates the need for decontaminating the enamel surface before bonding when the material of choice is Transbond XT, since this material has no affinity for humidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The orthodontic accessories used were the orthodontic button, which is the item most required by orthodontists as it is less voluminous when compared with brackets, with less friction than a bracket, thus diminishing inflammatory reactions at the surgical access site (SFONDRINI et al, 2010). In the present study, when the tooth surfaces were contaminated, and no decontamination was performed the bond strength values fell significantly when compared with the Control Group that presented a mean of 4.78 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This bond strength value is lower than the clinically accepted value, which is in agreement with previous investigations. 3,11,12,16,17 In a study on dry surfaces, a bond strength of 26.5 MPa was found, differing from the findings of Özto- P ϭ .544 vs group 9 P ϭ .020 vs group 10 P ϭ .124 vs group 10 P ϭ .048 vs group 11 P ϭ .096 vs group 11 P ϭ .997 vs group 12 P ϭ .632 vs group 12 prak et al 9 (15.28), who used the same adhesive material. In contrast, in the groups in which the enamel was contaminated with blood, the results were close to the value of 3.75 MPa obtained in our study (3.08).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%