1981
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810901)48:5<1106::aid-cncr2820480510>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bleomycin-radiotherapy combination in management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Twenty-five patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with bleomycin-radiotherapy protocol, 15 mg bleomycin I.V. on alternate days followed by radiation within half an hour. The average total dose of bleomycin was 150 mg. Radiotherapy was given daily. Two patients were lost to follow-up very early in the course of the treatment and were removed from the study for statistical purposes. Thirty-six patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with radiotherapy alone … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when administered concomitantly with radiation therapy, bleomycin did not increase either response rate or survival time when compared to radiation therapy alone. Severe mucosal reactions in the majority of patients required discontinuation of therapy (Shah et al, 1981). The lack of haematopoietic and hepatic toxicities suggested that bleomycin could be used in combination with other drugs giving significant response rates in patients with previously treated SCCHN (Ervin et al, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, when administered concomitantly with radiation therapy, bleomycin did not increase either response rate or survival time when compared to radiation therapy alone. Severe mucosal reactions in the majority of patients required discontinuation of therapy (Shah et al, 1981). The lack of haematopoietic and hepatic toxicities suggested that bleomycin could be used in combination with other drugs giving significant response rates in patients with previously treated SCCHN (Ervin et al, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%