Effect of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Among Primary Care Practices

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Interventions based on behavioral science might reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. OBJECTIVE To assess effects of behavioral interventions and rates of inappropriate (not guideline-concordant) antibiotic prescribing during ambulatory visits for acute respiratory tract infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cluster randomized clinical trial conducted among 47 primary care practices in Boston and Los Angeles. Participants were 248 enrolled clinicians randomized to receive 0, 1, 2, or 3 interventions for 18 months. All clinicians received education on antibiotic prescribing guidelines on enrollment. Interventions began between November 1, 2011, and October 1, 2012. Follow-up for the latest-starting sites ended on April 1, 2014. Adult patients with comorbidities and concomitant infections were excluded. INTERVENTIONS Three behavioral interventions, implemented alone or in combination: suggested alternatives presented electronic order sets suggesting nonantibiotic treatments; accountable justification prompted clinicians to enter free-text justifications for prescribing antibiotics into patients’ electronic health records; peer comparison sent emails to clinicians that compared their antibiotic prescribing rates with those of “top performers” (those with the lowest inappropriate prescribing rates). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Antibiotic prescribing rates for visits with antibiotic-inappropriate diagnoses (nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, and influenza) from 18 months preintervention to 18 months afterward, adjusting each intervention’s effects for co-occurring interventions and preintervention trends, with random effects for practices and clinicians. RESULTS There were 14 753 visits (mean patient age, 47 years; 69% women) for antibiotic-inappropriate acute respiratory tract infections during the baseline period and 16 959 visits (mean patient age, 48 years; 67% women) during the intervention period. Mean antibiotic prescribing rates decreased from 24.1% at intervention start to 13.1% at intervention month 18 (absolute difference, −11.0%) for control practices; from 22.1% to 6.1% (absolute difference, −16.0%) for suggested alternatives (difference in differences, −5.0% [95% CI, −7.8% to 0.1%]; P = .66 for differences in trajectories); from 23.2% to 5.2% (absolute difference, −18.1%) for accountable justification (difference in differences, −7.0% [95% CI, −9.1% to −2.9%]; P < .001); and from 19.9% to 3.7% (absolute difference, −16.3%) for peer comparison (difference in differences, −5.2% [95% CI, −6.9% to −1.6%]; P < .001). There were no statistically significant interactions (neither synergy nor interference) between interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among primary care practices, the use of accountable justification and peer comparison as behavioral interventions resulted in lower rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:

Geographic and Temporal Variation in Cardiac Implanted Electric Devices to Treat Heart Failure

“…Furthermore, recent developments in behavioral economics provide examples of effective means to improve adherence with guideline‐recommended practice, such as a sufficient course of optimal medical therapy prior to device implant. For example, a recent study found that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing could be reduced by regular emails to physicians describing their performance as “top performing” or not 54. Electronic health records could facilitate these interventions by enabling automatic report generation for physicians and patients.…”

Benzodiazepines are Prescribed More Frequently to Patients Already at Risk for Benzodiazepine-Related Adverse Events in Primary Care

“…[27][28][29] We extracted and combined sociodemographic and clinical information from the EHR with billing codes.…”

Cognitive reflection and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections

“…As part of a larger study, we invited 245 clinicians from 50 primary care practices in Boston and Los Angeles by e-mail to complete a web-based survey in June 2013 and January 2014, respectively (4,5). The full survey, of which the CRT was a part, generally took between 20 and 30 minutes to complete.…”