2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of asymmetric hot rolling on texture, microstructure and magnetic properties in a non-grain oriented electrical steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Fig. 9 fiber is most favorable, with two easy magnetization o0014directions in the rolling plane, whereas γ fiber is the most deleterious, without o0014 direction in the rolling plane [15][16][17]. Furthermore, Goss texture, desirable for oriented Fe-Si steel, is not wanted for non-oriented Fe-Si steel, as it intensifies the magnetic anisotropy [17].…”
Section: The Relation Between Texture and Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Fig. 9 fiber is most favorable, with two easy magnetization o0014directions in the rolling plane, whereas γ fiber is the most deleterious, without o0014 direction in the rolling plane [15][16][17]. Furthermore, Goss texture, desirable for oriented Fe-Si steel, is not wanted for non-oriented Fe-Si steel, as it intensifies the magnetic anisotropy [17].…”
Section: The Relation Between Texture and Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 fiber is most favorable, with two easy magnetization o0014directions in the rolling plane, whereas γ fiber is the most deleterious, without o0014 direction in the rolling plane [15][16][17]. Furthermore, Goss texture, desirable for oriented Fe-Si steel, is not wanted for non-oriented Fe-Si steel, as it intensifies the magnetic anisotropy [17]. The experimental steel is a kind of polycrystalline material, and its texture is composed of many different texture components, thus, it is very difficult to explain its magnetic variations due to mechanical cutting by qualitative analysis of intensity change in single texture component.…”
Section: The Relation Between Texture and Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been developed for this purpose [10,12,13,16,21,26,[38][39][40], some used destructive tests and others used nondestructive tests, but did so using samples of bigger dimensions than the ones used in the present work, as already mentioned. The present work demonstrates that the proposed approach can successfully identify the local easy direction independently of the sample geometry and in test areas of just 4.5 cm 2 , which does not occur with other nondestructive methods that require areas greater than 25 cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Destructive and nondestructive testing approaches based on Barkhousen noise have also been used for the same purpose. The magnetic properties of electrical steels such as core loss and magnetic induction depend on the microstructure and texture, which result from thermo-mechanical processes like slab reheating, hot-and cold-rolling, and final recrystallization annealing [10][11][12][13][14][15]. These processes can also generate noticeable magnetic anisotropy in the material because the magnetic behavior of steels strongly depends on their stress and strain states [11,13,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot band annealing with phase transformation lead to an enhanced intensity of the Goss and cube texture. It has also been domenstrated that a coarse grained hot band structure gives a higher intensity of Goss texture [12]. Fig.2 d, shows the tempered sample after quenching exhibit its ideal γ-fibre texture characterized by the presence of {111}〈110〉 and {111}〈112〉.…”
Section: B Textural Evolution In Processingmentioning
confidence: 93%