1976
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1976.11514692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Apple Rootstocks and Length and Type of Interstock on Leaf Nutrient Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lockard (1976) noted that leaf Ca of trees on MM.111 was lower than those on MM.106 or M.9 rootstocks. Lockard (1976) also reported that the level of K in the scion leaves was lower with M.9 than with MM.106 rootstocks or with 'Red Delicious' interstock. Whitfield (1963) reported significantly higher Ca but lower K and P in the leaves of 'Jonathan' than those of 'Cox's Orange Pippin.'…”
Section: Leaf Mineral Nutrition Of Traditional Apple Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lockard (1976) noted that leaf Ca of trees on MM.111 was lower than those on MM.106 or M.9 rootstocks. Lockard (1976) also reported that the level of K in the scion leaves was lower with M.9 than with MM.106 rootstocks or with 'Red Delicious' interstock. Whitfield (1963) reported significantly higher Ca but lower K and P in the leaves of 'Jonathan' than those of 'Cox's Orange Pippin.'…”
Section: Leaf Mineral Nutrition Of Traditional Apple Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They also noted that soil applications of lime and foliar sprays of calcium nitrate and calcium acetate resulted in higher Ca accumulation in the leaves of all tested cultivars on hibernal rootstock but had no effect on the leaves of these cultivars on french crab apple. Lockard (1976), in a greenhouse experiment with 'Red Delicious' on MM.111, MM.106, and M.9 rootstocks with and without 'Red Delicious', MM.106, or M.9 interstems reported that rootstock treatments differentially affected the leaf levels of N and Ca over a 4-year period. However, he did not observe differential effects of rootstocks on scion leaf Mg concentration as found by Hoblyn (1940-41) and Awad and Kenworthy (1963).…”
Section: Leaf Mineral Nutrition Of Traditional Apple Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of apple rootstock on tree size reflects the effect of rootstock on nutrient requirements (Fallahi, 2002). MM106 which classified as semi vigorous vegetative rootstock revealed higher content of K than M9 dwarf rootstock (Lockard, 1976). Fallahi et al(2002) stated that the M9 rootstock revealed the lowest concentration of k in the comparison with M7 and M26.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apple trees on M 9 rootstocks, for example, had higher foliar Ca and Mg levels than did those on M 7; trees on M 2 had higher foliar P, Ca, and Mg levels than did those on M 7; trees on M 2 had higher foliar P, Ca, and Mg levels than did those on M 16; M 7 rootstocks considerably reduced foliar Mg (18). MM 106 rootstock caused higher foliar Ca than did MM 111 (10,14); and trees on M 26 had significantly higher leaf Mn than did those on M 9/MM 106, M 2, or MM 109 (12). Transport rate of 45Ca and 32P to roots and scion is known to be related to the vigor class of the tree (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%