2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2010.00594.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Anchorage on the Accuracy of Fit in Removable Partial Denture Framework

Abstract: Within the limitations of the study it is concluded that the accuracy of fit of the palatal major connector was significantly better in the test group than the control group, with 0.1% level of significance at point P. The accuracy was significantly improved in both groups at point A by 1% level of confidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in the anterior strap were considered of acceptable clinical value for both techniques (<0.31 mm). Gowri et al found a misfit of 0.16 mm at the anterior border of the palatal strap major connector, similar to the direct technique results from this study. The indirect technique results of this study were in opposition to other studies, which showed the greatest misfit occurred at the anterior strap area of the indirect RP techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results in the anterior strap were considered of acceptable clinical value for both techniques (<0.31 mm). Gowri et al found a misfit of 0.16 mm at the anterior border of the palatal strap major connector, similar to the direct technique results from this study. The indirect technique results of this study were in opposition to other studies, which showed the greatest misfit occurred at the anterior strap area of the indirect RP techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results in the anterior strap were considered of acceptable clinical value for both techniques (<0.31 mm). Gowri et al 15 found a misfit of 0.16 mm at the anterior border of the palatal strap major connector, similar to the direct technique results from this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, due to the complexity of regular RPD structures, and a wide range of designs, few studies have evaluated the fit and accuracy of RPDs quantitatively; specifically, by digital superimposition of the STL format of the scanned models. To evaluate the fit and accuracy of RPD frameworks, visual inspection, pressing test, and indirect measurements of the gap filled with an impression material have been reported in the literature . However, a limitation regarding past methods is that these measurements were made in specific locations, and thus, do not reflect the actual overall fit of the RPD framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of analyzing the accuracy and fit of an RPD framework have been reported . Some of these methods include the application of different disclosing materials, sectioning the RPD and direct measurements of the gaps between the prosthesis and the master casts, and digital superimposition of models .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%