Effect of an Intensive Outpatient Program to Augment Primary Care for High-Need Veterans Affairs Patients

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Many organizations are adopting intensive outpatient care programs for high-need patients, yet little is known about their effectiveness in integrated systems with established patient-centered medical homes.OBJECTIVE To evaluate how augmenting the Veterans Affairs (VA) medical home (Patient Aligned Care Teams [PACT]) with an Intensive Management program (ImPACT) influences high-need patients' costs, health care utilization, and experience. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSRandomized clinical trial at a single VA facility. Among 583 eligible high-need outpatients whose health care costs or hospitalization risk were in the top 5% for the facility, 150 were randomly selected for ImPACT; the remaining 433 received standard PACT care. INTERVENTIONSThe ImPACT multidisciplinary team addressed health care needs and quality of life through comprehensive patient assessments, intensive case management, care coordination, and social and recreational services. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPrimary difference-in-difference analyses examined changes in health care costs and acute and extended care utilization over a 16-month baseline and 17-month follow-up period. Secondary analyses estimated the intervention's effect on ImPACT participants (using randomization as an instrument) and for patients with key sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. ImPACT participants' satisfaction and activation levels were assessed using responses to quality improvement surveys administered at baseline and 6 months. RESULTSOf 140 patients assigned to ImPACT, 96 (69%) engaged in the program (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [14.2] years; 89 [93%] male; mean [SD] number of chronic conditions, 10 [4]; 62 [65%] had a mental health diagnosis; 21 [22%] had a history of homelessness). After accounting for program costs, adjusted person-level monthly health care expenditures decreased similarly for ImPACT and PACT patients (difference-in-difference [SE] −$101 [$623]), as did acute and extended care utilization rates. Among respondents to the ImPACT follow-up survey (n = 54 [56% response rate]), 52 (96%) reported that they would recommend the program to others, and pre-post analyses revealed modest increases in satisfaction with VA care (mean [SD] increased from 2.90 [0.72] to 3.16 [0.60]; P = .04) and communication (mean [SD] increased from 2.99 [0.74] to 3.18 [0.60]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Intensive outpatient care for high-need patients did not reduce acute care utilization or costs compared with standard VA care, although there were positive effects on experience among patients who participated. Implementing intensive outpatient care programs in integrated settings with well-established medical homes may not prevent hospitalizations or achieve substantial cost savings. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02932228

Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review

“…Searches resulted in 4151 potentially relevant articles. Of these, we included 11 randomized controlled trials [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and seven observational studies. [42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Tables 2 and 3 summarize the study and intervention characteristics.…”

Persistence of High Health Care Costs among VA Patients

“…; Zulman et al. ). Many people exhibit patterns that are analogous to “regression to mean” in subsequent periods without any intervention, highlighting the need for rigorous evaluation of programs intervening on high‐cost patients.…”

Patient Activation Changes as a Potential Signal for Changes in Health Care Costs: Cohort Study of US High-Cost Patients

“…Finally, pre-post studies may reflect regression to the mean. 2 Therefore, it would be advantageous to have an early indicator or a proxy for changes in costs to allow an estimate of the relative effectiveness of different interventions, even when numbers are small and claims analysis unavailable or delayed.…”