2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4657-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Activation Changes as a Potential Signal for Changes in Health Care Costs: Cohort Study of US High-Cost Patients

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Programs to improve quality of care and lower costs for the highest utilizers of health services are proliferating, yet such programs have difficulty demonstrating cost savings. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explore the degree to which changes in Patient Activation Measure (PAM) levels predict health care costs among high-risk patients. PARTICIPANTS: De-identified claims, demographic data, and serial PAM scores were analyzed on 2155 patients from multiple medical groups engaged in an existing Center… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians must continue to develop and test consumer informatics tools' as well as understand the underlying mechanisms that affect differences in patient outcomes when using those tools. There is evidence that developing individualized plans of care, based on patient activation scores, improves patient outcomes (Greene et al, 2015;Hibbard et al, 2015Hibbard et al, , 2017Lindsay et al, 2018;Sacks et al, 2017); however, further research is needed to evaluate if the mediating effects of income and financial security on patient activation found in this research persist in other patient populations. When clinicians have access to their patient's financial capability data, they have the opportunity to co-develop plans of care that are sensitive to this social determinant of health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinicians must continue to develop and test consumer informatics tools' as well as understand the underlying mechanisms that affect differences in patient outcomes when using those tools. There is evidence that developing individualized plans of care, based on patient activation scores, improves patient outcomes (Greene et al, 2015;Hibbard et al, 2015Hibbard et al, , 2017Lindsay et al, 2018;Sacks et al, 2017); however, further research is needed to evaluate if the mediating effects of income and financial security on patient activation found in this research persist in other patient populations. When clinicians have access to their patient's financial capability data, they have the opportunity to co-develop plans of care that are sensitive to this social determinant of health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In several studies, Black individuals had a lower level of patient activation than White individuals (Alexander et al, 2012;Eneanya et al, 2016;Hibbard et al, 2008;Lubetkin et al, 2010). Lower engagement in self-managing behaviors in Black populations may contribute to differences in health outcomes (Lindsay et al, 2018). Promisingly, when the difference in PAM level decreases between populations, models predict parity in health outcomes regardless of race (Hibbard et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Guo et al's analysis did not display the baseline distribution of PAM levels, we do not know how many participants started at the lower activation levels and moved up to a higher level during the intervention. This can be impactful as moving up just one level of activation is linked with a reduction in health care costs of 8 percent over a one‐year period . Similarly, we are unable to discern from the data shown, which participants were helped most by the WIN program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…37 Improvements in PAM levels are associated with lower odds of having an emergency department visit 38 and lower health care costs among highcost patients. 39 These findings suggest greater costeffectiveness when targeting patients at increased risk for high costs. Moreover, the intervention was successful in engaging patients in use of the ePHR with a variety of educational levels and variable rates of prior electronic technology use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%